PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVBW vs. AMZY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVBW vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVBW achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly higher than AMZY's 3.56% return.


NVBW

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.96%
YTD
5.11%
6M
5.47%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
10Y*

AMZY

1D
-2.31%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
3.56%
6M
3.86%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVBW vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVBW
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF
5.11%9.25%9.03%0.78%
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
3.56%10.39%35.28%18.31%

Correlation

The correlation between NVBW and AMZY is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023

0.61

The correlation between NVBW and AMZY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVBW vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVBW
NVBW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NVBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVBW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NVBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVBW Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVBW vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVBWAMZYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

0.61

+1.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.72

0.95

+2.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.13

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

0.73

+2.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.81

1.81

+14.00

NVBW vs. AMZY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVBW Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the AMZY Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVBW and AMZY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVBWAMZYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

0.61

+1.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

0.94

+0.54

Drawdowns

NVBW vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVBW drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum AMZY drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVBW and AMZY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVBWAMZYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-23.70%

+15.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-19.61%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-7.53%

+7.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-5.32%

+4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

7.88%

-7.09%

Volatility

NVBW vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) is 0.82%, while YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that NVBW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVBWAMZYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

6.01%

-5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.21%

16.09%

-11.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97%

23.59%

-18.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.93%

25.06%

-18.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.93%

25.06%

-18.13%

NVBW vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVBW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVBW vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison

NVBW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.72%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
57.72%52.59%47.91%9.90%
NVBW
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVBW and AMZY have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZY has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to NVBW (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVBW dropped -8.41% vs AMZY's -23.70%.

On 1-year performance, AMZY leads with 14.23% vs 12.47% for NVBW. On fees, NVBW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, NVBW has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 12.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVBW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 57.72%, compared with 0.00% for NVBW.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for NVBW and 0.99% for AMZY.

NVBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVBW and AMZY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer