NUV vs. PRXCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NUV (Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc.) and PRXCX (T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, NUV returned 2.43%/yr vs 2.35%/yr for PRXCX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUV charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PRXCX.

Performance

NUV vs. PRXCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) and T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUV achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than PRXCX's 2.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NUV having a 2.43% annualized return and PRXCX not far behind at 2.35%.

NUV

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 10.54%
• 3Y*: 5.20%
• 5Y*: -0.87%
• 10Y*: 2.43%

PRXCX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 2.02%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 9.26%
• 3Y*: 4.80%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: 2.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUV vs. PRXCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NUV Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc.	1.79%	10.27%	4.04%	3.99%	-14.03%	-3.51%	7.50%	19.75%	-4.83%	10.33%
PRXCX T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund	2.02%	3.99%	3.62%	7.64%	-9.93%	2.68%	4.39%	7.31%	0.75%	5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NUV and PRXCX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 1987	0.20

The correlation between NUV and PRXCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.40 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NUV vs. PRXCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUV

NUV Risk / Return Rank: 36
NUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
NUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
NUV Omega Ratio Rank: 28
NUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
NUV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PRXCX

PRXCX Risk / Return Rank: 79
PRXCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PRXCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
PRXCX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PRXCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PRXCX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUV vs. PRXCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) and T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NUV	PRXCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	2.89	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	4.67	-2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.74	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	3.04	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.75	11.29	-0.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NUV vs. PRXCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUV Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the PRXCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUV and PRXCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NUV	PRXCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	2.89	-1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	0.34	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.57	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	1.09	-0.81

Drawdowns

NUV vs. PRXCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUV drawdown since its inception was -35.42%, which is greater than PRXCX's maximum drawdown of -21.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUV and PRXCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUV	PRXCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.42%	-21.67%	-13.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.20%	-3.02%	-1.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.24%	-6.68%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.29%	-15.41%	-12.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.29%	-15.41%	-12.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.86%	-0.04%	-7.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.99%	-2.78%	-6.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.98%	0.81%	+0.17%

Volatility

NUV vs. PRXCX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc. (NUV) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund (PRXCX) at 1.29%. This indicates that NUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRXCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUV	PRXCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	1.29%	+1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.17%	2.37%	+2.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.99%	3.20%	+3.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.56%	4.41%	+5.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.34%	4.14%	+6.20%

NUV vs. PRXCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUV has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than PRXCX's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUV vs. PRXCX - Dividend Comparison

NUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than PRXCX's 4.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NUV Nuveen Municipal Value Fund Inc.	4.30%	4.30%	4.16%	3.94%	3.91%	3.41%	3.35%	3.48%	4.01%	3.99%	4.10%	3.95%
PRXCX T. Rowe Price California Tax Free Bond Fund	4.61%	4.58%	4.10%	3.50%	2.21%	2.82%	2.80%	2.94%	3.11%	3.09%	3.33%	3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUV and PRXCX in my portfolio?

NUV and PRXCX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUV or PRXCX?

NUV has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to PRXCX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUV dropped -35.42% vs PRXCX's -21.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRXCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.