FCOQX vs. DFABX
FCOQX (Franklin Colorado Tax-Free Income Fund Class A) and DFABX (DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, FCOQX returned 3.77%/yr vs 2.82%/yr for DFABX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCOQX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DFABX.
Performance
FCOQX vs. DFABX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCOQX achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than DFABX's 0.98% return.
FCOQX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 7.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
DFABX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 2.66%
- 3Y*
- 2.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCOQX vs. DFABX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCOQX Franklin Colorado Tax-Free Income Fund Class A | 1.63% | 3.34% | 2.47% | 5.62% | -3.37% |
DFABX DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.98% | 2.46% | 2.90% | 2.87% | 0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCOQX and DFABX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2022 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FCOQX and DFABX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCOQX vs. DFABX — Risk / Return Rank
FCOQX
DFABX
FCOQX vs. DFABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Colorado Tax-Free Income Fund Class A (FCOQX) and DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCOQX | DFABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.44 | 4.77 | -2.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.87 | 12.57 | -8.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 6.47 | -4.89 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 24.98 | -22.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 108.37 | -98.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCOQX | DFABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 4.77 | -2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 2.48 | -2.05 |
Drawdowns
FCOQX vs. DFABX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCOQX drawdown since its inception was -15.80%, which is greater than DFABX's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCOQX and DFABX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCOQX | DFABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.80% | -2.46% | -13.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.72% | -0.11% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.79% | -0.60% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | 0.00% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -0.24% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 0.02% | +0.77% |
Volatility
FCOQX vs. DFABX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Colorado Tax-Free Income Fund Class A (FCOQX) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFABX) at 0.20%. This indicates that FCOQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCOQX | DFABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 0.20% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.16% | 0.42% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06% | 0.56% | +2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 0.96% | +3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 0.96% | +3.46% |
FCOQX vs. DFABX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCOQX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DFABX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCOQX vs. DFABX - Dividend Comparison
FCOQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than DFABX's 2.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFABX DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.63% | 2.33% | 2.86% | 2.52% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCOQX Franklin Colorado Tax-Free Income Fund Class A | 3.17% | 3.13% | 3.01% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 2.09% | 2.37% | 2.95% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCOQX and DFABX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCOQX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to DFABX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCOQX dropped -15.80% vs DFABX's -2.46%.
DFABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.77 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCOQX and DFABX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer