NUSIX vs. SMBPX
NUSIX (Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund) and SMBPX (Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, NUSIX returned 3.68%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for SMBPX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUSIX charges 0.71%/yr vs 3.16%/yr for SMBPX.
Performance
NUSIX vs. SMBPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NUSIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- —
SMBPX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 1.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- -0.15%
NUSIX vs. SMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUSIX Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund | 1.56% | 4.63% | 5.54% | 5.64% | 1.14% | 0.36% | 1.49% | 1.60% |
SMBPX Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.00% | 2.92% | -0.11% | 1.84% | -2.57% | -1.39% | 0.77% | 0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUSIX and SMBPX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUSIX vs. SMBPX — Risk / Return Rank
NUSIX
SMBPX
NUSIX vs. SMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (NUSIX) and Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUSIX | SMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +22.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 18.90 | 2.24 | +16.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 43.25 | 6.47 | +36.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 337.91 | 15.19 | +322.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUSIX | SMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.91 | 3.15 | +3.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 4.83 | 0.08 | +4.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.74 | 0.88 | +2.86 |
Drawdowns
NUSIX vs. SMBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUSIX drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, smaller than the maximum SMBPX drawdown of -9.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSIX and SMBPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUSIX | SMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -9.99% | +7.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -0.69% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.10% | -4.48% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.80% | -6.52% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.99% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -2.47% | +2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.28% | -0.27% |
Volatility
NUSIX vs. SMBPX - Volatility Comparison
Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund (NUSIX) has a higher volatility of 0.18% compared to Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio (SMBPX) at 0.00%. This indicates that NUSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUSIX | SMBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | 0.00% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | 0.39% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 1.43% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.77% | 2.20% | -1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.83% | 1.96% | -1.13% |
NUSIX vs. SMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUSIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than SMBPX's 3.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUSIX vs. SMBPX - Dividend Comparison
NUSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than SMBPX's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUSIX Navigator Ultra Short Term Bond Fund | 4.16% | 4.25% | 5.23% | 4.92% | 1.74% | 0.66% | 1.08% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMBPX Saratoga Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.69% | 2.69% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.36% | 0.23% | 4.23% | 1.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUSIX and SMBPX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUSIX has higher volatility (0.18%) compared to SMBPX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUSIX dropped -2.69% vs SMBPX's -9.99%.
NUSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.91 vs 3.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUSIX and SMBPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer