NUSC vs. NDVG
NUSC (Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF) and NDVG (Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUSC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Small Cap, while NDVG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nuveen. NUSC is passively managed, while NDVG is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NUSC charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for NDVG.
Performance
NUSC vs. NDVG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NUSC
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 27.41%
- 3Y*
- 13.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.68%
- 10Y*
- —
NDVG
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUSC vs. NDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUSC Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF | 12.88% | 7.72% | 8.29% | 15.72% | -17.73% | 1.68% |
NDVG Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF | -1.62% | 10.06% | 17.60% | 15.15% | -9.55% | 11.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUSC and NDVG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between NUSC and NDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUSC vs. NDVG — Risk / Return Rank
NUSC
NDVG
NUSC vs. NDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC) and Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF (NDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUSC | NDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUSC | NDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | — | — |
Drawdowns
NUSC vs. NDVG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUSC | NDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | — | — |
Volatility
NUSC vs. NDVG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUSC | NDVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.11% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.15% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | — | — |
NUSC vs. NDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUSC has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than NDVG's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUSC vs. NDVG - Dividend Comparison
NUSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than NDVG's 4.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDVG Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF | 4.41% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.24% | 1.34% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUSC Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF | 0.93% | 1.05% | 1.15% | 1.11% | 1.16% | 7.06% | 0.52% | 0.90% | 3.95% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUSC and NDVG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NUSC is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NUSC is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for NDVG.
NDVG has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 0.93% for NUSC.
NUSC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while NDVG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUSC and 0.64% for NDVG.
Find the right allocation for NUSC and NDVG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer