PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUSC vs. FSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NUSC vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NUSC vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NUSC
Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
0.92%7.72%8.29%15.72%-17.73%17.51%23.69%8.56%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.72%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUSC achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than FSMD's 1.72% return.


NUSC

1D
3.46%
1M
-5.64%
YTD
0.92%
6M
3.24%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
9.56%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*

FSMD

1D
3.04%
1M
-4.67%
YTD
1.72%
6M
2.29%
1Y
15.81%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NUSC vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUSC has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NUSC vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUSC
NUSC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
NUSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUSC vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUSCFSMDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

0.79

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.33

1.26

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.33

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.06

5.61

-0.54

NUSC vs. FSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the FSMD Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUSC and FSMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUSCFSMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

0.79

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.43

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.47

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between NUSC and FSMD is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NUSC vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison

NUSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than FSMD's 1.37% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUSC
Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
1.04%1.05%1.15%1.11%1.16%7.06%0.52%0.90%3.95%0.94%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.37%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NUSC vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUSC drawdown since its inception was -41.49%, roughly equal to the maximum FSMD drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSC and FSMD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NUSCFSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.49%

-40.67%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.76%

-12.63%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.85%

-22.16%

-6.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.00%

-5.65%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.33%

-6.12%

-2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

3.01%

+0.60%

Volatility

NUSC vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) have volatilities of 6.95% and 6.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NUSCFSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.95%

6.73%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.88%

11.32%

+1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.30%

20.07%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.19%

18.43%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.46%

21.54%

+0.92%