PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUSC vs. FLQS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUSC vs. FLQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUSC achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly higher than FLQS's 6.14% return.


NUSC

1D
-0.57%
1M
3.77%
YTD
12.88%
6M
12.74%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
13.27%
5Y*
4.68%
10Y*

FLQS

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.12%
YTD
6.14%
6M
5.99%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUSC vs. FLQS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUSC
Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
12.88%7.72%8.29%15.72%-17.73%17.51%23.69%27.09%-9.40%10.96%
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
6.14%5.04%8.34%21.28%-16.88%26.58%10.51%18.34%-5.86%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NUSC and FLQS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2017

0.88

The correlation between NUSC and FLQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUSC vs. FLQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUSC
NUSC Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
NUSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FLQS
FLQS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FLQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQS Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUSC vs. FLQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUSCFLQSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.17

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

1.54

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.81

4.55

+5.26

NUSC vs. FLQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the FLQS Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUSC and FLQS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUSCFLQSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

0.91

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.28

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.38

+0.06

Drawdowns

NUSC vs. FLQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUSC drawdown since its inception was -41.49%, roughly equal to the maximum FLQS drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSC and FLQS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUSCFLQSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.49%

-42.16%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-9.00%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.95%

-23.12%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.85%

-28.05%

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-1.33%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-8.02%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

3.05%

-0.25%

Volatility

NUSC vs. FLQS - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF (NUSC) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (FLQS) at 4.09%. This indicates that NUSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUSCFLQSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

4.09%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

10.26%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.11%

15.22%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.15%

19.24%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

21.68%

+0.68%

NUSC vs. FLQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUSC has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FLQS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUSC vs. FLQS - Dividend Comparison

NUSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than FLQS's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLQS
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
1.35%1.16%1.29%1.75%1.40%0.95%1.20%1.41%1.27%1.02%
NUSC
Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF
0.93%1.05%1.15%1.11%1.16%7.06%0.52%0.90%3.95%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, NUSC and FLQS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NUSC has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to FLQS (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUSC dropped -41.49% vs FLQS's -42.16%.

On 5-year performance, FLQS leads with 5.27% vs 4.68% for NUSC. On fees, NUSC is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FLQS has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLQS has performed better with a 5.27% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUSC is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FLQS.

FLQS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.93% for NUSC.

NUSC tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Small Cap, while FLQS tracks LibertyQ U.S. Small Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUSC and 0.35% for FLQS.

NUSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUSC and FLQS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer