PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUSB vs. NULV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NUSB vs. NULV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NUSB vs. NULV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NUSB
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF
0.83%4.71%4.50%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.00%16.31%7.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUSB achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than NULV's 1.00% return.


NUSB

1D
0.06%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.94%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NULV

1D
2.09%
1M
-5.29%
YTD
1.00%
6M
5.52%
1Y
14.22%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
7.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NUSB vs. NULV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUSB has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than NULV's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NUSB vs. NULV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUSB
NUSB Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
NUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUSB vs. NULV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUSBNULVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

10.42

0.96

+9.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

26.35

1.40

+24.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

6.58

1.20

+5.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

27.86

1.38

+26.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

203.13

6.19

+196.95

NUSB vs. NULV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUSB Sharpe Ratio is 10.42, which is higher than the NULV Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUSB and NULV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUSBNULVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.42

0.96

+9.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

12.47

0.53

+11.94

Correlation

The correlation between NUSB and NULV is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NUSB vs. NULV - Dividend Comparison

NUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than NULV's 1.62% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUSB
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF
4.42%4.51%3.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.62%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%

Drawdowns

NUSB vs. NULV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum NULV drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSB and NULV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NUSBNULVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-36.99%

+36.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.16%

-11.32%

+11.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.35%

+5.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-5.05%

+5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

2.52%

-2.50%

Volatility

NUSB vs. NULV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) is 0.13%, while Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that NUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NULV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NUSBNULVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

4.15%

-4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.23%

8.12%

-7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42%

14.91%

-14.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.39%

14.31%

-13.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.39%

17.12%

-16.73%