NUSB vs. NUBD
NUSB (Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF) and NUBD (Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUSB is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Nuveen, while NUBD is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Select Index. NUSB is actively managed, while NUBD is passively managed. Over the past year, NUSB returned 4.32% vs 4.97% for NUBD. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUSB charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for NUBD.
Performance
NUSB vs. NUBD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUSB achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than NUBD's 0.20% return.
NUSB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUBD
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- -0.06%
- 10Y*
- —
NUSB vs. NUBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NUSB Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF | 1.52% | 4.71% | 4.50% |
NUBD Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.20% | 6.75% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUSB and NUBD is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUSB vs. NUBD — Risk / Return Rank
NUSB
NUBD
NUSB vs. NUBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUSB | NUBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +10.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +30.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 9.19 | 1.23 | +7.95 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 72.98 | 1.81 | +71.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 397.82 | 5.38 | +392.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUSB | NUBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80 | 1.32 | +10.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 12.54 | 0.29 | +12.25 |
Drawdowns
NUSB vs. NUBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum NUBD drawdown of -19.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSB and NUBD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUSB | NUBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -19.45% | +19.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.06% | -2.76% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.93% | +3.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -6.05% | +6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.93% | -0.92% |
Volatility
NUSB vs. NUBD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) is 0.09%, while Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUBD) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that NUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUSB | NUBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.09% | 1.23% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.23% | 2.61% | -2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37% | 3.79% | -3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.39% | 5.99% | -5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.39% | 5.12% | -4.73% |
NUSB vs. NUBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUSB has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than NUBD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NUSB vs. NUBD - Dividend Comparison
NUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, more than NUBD's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUBD Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.99% | 3.90% | 3.51% | 2.99% | 2.83% | 2.05% | 2.21% | 2.66% | 3.08% | 0.58% |
NUSB Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF | 4.30% | 4.51% | 3.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUSB and NUBD have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUBD has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to NUSB (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUSB dropped -0.16% vs NUBD's -19.45%.
On 1-year performance, NUBD leads with 4.97% vs 4.32% for NUSB. On fees, NUBD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, NUSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NUBD has performed better with a 4.97% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUBD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for NUSB.
NUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 3.99% for NUBD.
NUSB is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while NUBD is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for NUSB and 0.15% for NUBD.
NUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.80 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUSB and NUBD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer