NUSB vs. CUSD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD).

NUSB and CUSD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUSB is an actively managed fund by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 5, 2024. CUSD is an actively managed fund by CrossingBridge. It was launched on Sep 20, 2021.

Performance

NUSB vs. CUSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NUSB vs. CUSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NUSB Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF	0.83%	4.71%	4.50%
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	2.92%	5.02%	3.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUSB achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than CUSD's 2.92% return.

NUSB

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CUSD

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 6M: 3.01%
• 1Y: 6.54%
• 3Y*: 5.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUSB vs. CUSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUSB has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than CUSD's 0.81% expense ratio.

CUSD

CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF

NUSB

Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF

Return for Risk

NUSB vs. CUSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUSB

NUSB Risk / Return Rank: 100
NUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
NUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
NUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 100
NUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
NUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CUSD

CUSD Risk / Return Rank: 35
CUSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CUSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
CUSD Omega Ratio Rank: 36
CUSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
CUSD Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUSB vs. CUSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NUSB	CUSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	10.42	0.51	+9.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	26.35	0.86	+25.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	6.58	1.15	+5.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	27.86	1.22	+26.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	203.13	3.53	+199.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NUSB vs. CUSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUSB Sharpe Ratio is 10.42, which is higher than the CUSD Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUSB and CUSD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NUSB	CUSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.42	0.51	+9.91
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	12.47	0.79	+11.68

Correlation

The correlation between NUSB and CUSD is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

NUSB vs. CUSD - Dividend Comparison

NUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than CUSD's 13.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NUSB Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF	4.42%	4.51%	3.61%	0.00%	0.00%
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	13.65%	14.05%	7.10%	3.62%	1.14%

Drawdowns

NUSB vs. CUSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, smaller than the maximum CUSD drawdown of -5.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSB and CUSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUSB	CUSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.16%	-5.42%	+5.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.16%	-5.42%	+5.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.31%	+1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-0.40%	+0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	1.87%	-1.85%

Volatility

NUSB vs. CUSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) is 0.13%, while CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that NUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CUSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUSB	CUSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.13%	3.92%	-3.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.23%	9.34%	-9.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42%	12.81%	-12.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.39%	6.50%	-6.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.39%	6.50%	-6.11%