NUSB vs. CLIP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP).

NUSB and CLIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NUSB is an actively managed fund by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 5, 2024. CLIP is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2023.

Performance

NUSB vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NUSB vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NUSB Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF	0.83%	4.71%	4.50%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	0.86%	4.23%	4.28%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NUSB having a 0.83% return and CLIP slightly higher at 0.86%.

NUSB

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLIP

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 6M: 1.89%
• 1Y: 4.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUSB vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUSB has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

NUSB

Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF

CLIP

Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF

Return for Risk

NUSB vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUSB

NUSB Risk / Return Rank: 100
NUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
NUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
NUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 100
NUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
NUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CLIP

CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUSB vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NUSB	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	10.42	13.56	-3.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	26.35	40.64	-14.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	6.58	11.02	-4.44
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	27.86	74.34	-46.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	203.13	595.00	-391.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NUSB vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUSB Sharpe Ratio is 10.42, which is comparable to the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 13.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUSB and CLIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NUSB	CLIP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.42	13.56	-3.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	12.47	10.60	+1.87

Correlation

The correlation between NUSB and CLIP is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NUSB vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

NUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than CLIP's 4.03% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NUSB Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF	4.42%	4.51%	3.61%	0.00%
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	4.03%	4.14%	5.11%	2.75%

Drawdowns

NUSB vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.16%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUSB and CLIP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUSB	CLIP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.16%	-0.08%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.16%	-0.05%	-0.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	0.01%	+0.01%

Volatility

NUSB vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) has a higher volatility of 0.13% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.05%. This indicates that NUSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUSB	CLIP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.13%	0.05%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.23%	0.15%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42%	0.30%	+0.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.39%	0.45%	-0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.39%	0.45%	-0.06%