PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NURE vs. USRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NURE vs. USRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NURE achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly lower than USRT's 20.34% return.


NURE

1D
0.57%
1M
-0.58%
6M
18.91%
YTD
18.91%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
7.98%
5Y*
1.68%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.39%

USRT

1D
0.06%
1M
0.70%
6M
17.86%
YTD
20.34%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
13.00%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
6.14%
ALL TIME*
5.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$89.66K$88.12K$134.65K
$32.34M$32.36M$34.42M

NURE vs. USRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
18.91%-7.51%6.65%13.09%-28.48%53.41%-7.24%25.10%0.02%8.41%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
20.34%2.44%8.58%13.64%-24.43%43.26%-8.06%25.98%-4.67%5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NURE and USRT is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.86

The correlation between NURE and USRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NURE vs. USRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NURE
NURE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

USRT
USRT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
USRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
USRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NURE vs. USRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUREUSRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.32

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.17

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

10.68

-5.02

NURE vs. USRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NURE Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the USRT Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NURE and USRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NURE vs. USRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NURE drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, smaller than the maximum USRT drawdown of -69.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NURE and USRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUREUSRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-69.92%

+23.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-8.04%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.03%

-18.70%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.98%

-31.03%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.25%

-2.71%

-3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.22%

-12.87%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

2.38%

+1.31%

Volatility

NURE vs. USRT - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) at 4.47%. This indicates that NURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUREUSRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

4.47%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

10.64%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

13.77%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.69%

18.94%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.72%

21.34%

+0.38%

NURE vs. USRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NURE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than USRT's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

NURE vs. USRT - Dividend Comparison

NURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than USRT's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
4.02%4.56%3.51%3.73%2.80%1.34%3.41%3.28%4.11%3.86%0.48%0.00%
USRT
iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF
2.51%3.07%2.85%3.18%3.46%2.27%3.12%3.34%5.66%3.44%3.98%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


NURE and USRT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NURE has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to USRT (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NURE dropped -46.05% vs USRT's -69.92%.

On 5-year performance, USRT leads with 5.39% vs 1.68% for NURE. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, USRT has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USRT has performed better with a 5.39% return vs 1.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NURE.

NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.51% for USRT.

NURE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index, while USRT tracks FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NURE and 0.08% for USRT.

USRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NURE and USRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer