NURE vs. NUMV
NURE (Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF) and NUMV (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NURE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index, while NUMV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NURE returned 1.78%/yr vs 7.06%/yr for NUMV. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NURE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for NUMV.
Performance
NURE vs. NUMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NURE achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly higher than NUMV's 9.23% return.
NURE
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 6M
- 15.97%
- 1Y
- 10.47%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- —
NUMV
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- 1Y
- 21.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- —
NURE vs. NUMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 14.93% | -7.51% | 6.65% | 13.09% | -28.48% | 53.41% | -7.24% | 25.10% | 0.02% | 8.41% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 9.23% | 14.05% | 12.31% | 8.43% | -14.97% | 31.15% | 0.91% | 29.81% | -11.91% | 14.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between NURE and NUMV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016 | 0.64 |
The correlation between NURE and NUMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NURE vs. NUMV — Risk / Return Rank
NURE
NUMV
NURE vs. NUMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NURE | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.30 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 2.52 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.39 | 9.49 | -7.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NURE vs. NUMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NURE drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, which is greater than NUMV's maximum drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NURE and NUMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NURE | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.05% | -43.46% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -8.71% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.03% | -19.53% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.98% | -25.71% | -10.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.39% | -1.69% | -7.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -6.85% | -5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 2.30% | +2.08% |
Volatility
NURE vs. NUMV - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) at 3.49%. This indicates that NURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NURE | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 3.49% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 9.41% | +2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.02% | 12.62% | +3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 17.37% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 19.73% | +2.05% |
NURE vs. NUMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NURE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than NUMV's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
NURE vs. NUMV - Dividend Comparison
NURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than NUMV's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.40% | 1.53% | 1.81% | 2.20% | 5.78% | 6.62% | 1.38% | 2.40% | 4.01% | 0.83% | 0.00% |
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 4.33% | 4.56% | 3.51% | 3.73% | 2.80% | 1.34% | 3.41% | 3.28% | 4.11% | 3.86% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NURE and NUMV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NURE has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to NUMV (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NURE dropped -46.05% vs NUMV's -43.46%.
On 5-year performance, NUMV leads with 7.06% vs 1.78% for NURE. On fees, NUMV is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, NUMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUMV has performed better with a 7.06% return vs 1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUMV is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NURE.
NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 1.40% for NUMV.
NURE is categorized as REIT, while NUMV is Mid Cap Value Equities. NURE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index, while NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NURE and 0.31% for NUMV.
NUMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NURE and NUMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer