PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NURE vs. NUMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NURE vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NURE vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
-2.11%-7.51%6.65%13.09%-28.48%53.41%-7.24%25.10%0.02%8.41%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-13.96%0.78%11.99%20.47%-28.31%12.27%45.73%34.87%-5.79%19.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NURE achieves a -2.11% return, which is significantly higher than NUMG's -13.96% return.


NURE

1D
0.94%
1M
-6.68%
YTD
-2.11%
6M
-3.10%
1Y
-8.77%
3Y*
1.13%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*

NUMG

1D
3.29%
1M
-6.68%
YTD
-13.96%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-4.28%
3Y*
2.51%
5Y*
-1.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NURE vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NURE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NURE vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NURE
NURE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NURE vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NURENUMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.45

-0.18

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.53

-0.10

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.99

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

-0.21

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.20

-0.65

-0.55

NURE vs. NUMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NURE Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the NUMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NURE and NUMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NURENUMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

-0.18

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

-0.08

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.37

-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between NURE and NUMG is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NURE vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison

NURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
5.08%4.56%3.51%3.73%2.80%1.34%3.41%3.28%4.11%3.86%0.48%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%0.00%

Drawdowns

NURE vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NURE drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, which is greater than NUMG's maximum drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NURE and NUMG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NURENUMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-38.85%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.10%

-19.71%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.98%

-38.85%

+2.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.83%

-21.68%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-11.30%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.52%

6.47%

+0.05%

Volatility

NURE vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) is 4.58%, while Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that NURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NURENUMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

6.83%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

14.15%

-3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.42%

23.42%

-4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

22.83%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.89%

21.92%

-0.03%