PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NURE vs. NUMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NURE vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NURE achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly higher than NUMG's -6.21% return.


NURE

1D
0.84%
1M
4.01%
YTD
14.93%
6M
15.97%
1Y
10.47%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*

NUMG

1D
-0.75%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
-6.21%
6M
-7.69%
1Y
-5.00%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
-1.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NURE vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
14.93%-7.51%6.65%13.09%-28.48%53.41%-7.24%25.10%0.02%8.41%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-6.21%0.78%11.99%20.47%-28.31%12.27%45.73%34.87%-5.79%19.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NURE and NUMG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.46

The correlation between NURE and NUMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NURE vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NURE
NURE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NURE vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NURENUMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.97

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

-0.25

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.39

-0.64

+3.04

NURE vs. NUMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NURE Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the NUMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NURE and NUMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NURE vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NURE drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, which is greater than NUMG's maximum drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NURE and NUMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NURENUMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.05%

-38.85%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-19.71%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.03%

-26.58%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.98%

-38.85%

+2.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.39%

-14.62%

+5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-11.37%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

7.78%

-3.40%

Volatility

NURE vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) is 4.29%, while Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that NURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NURENUMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

6.32%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

15.10%

-3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

18.64%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

22.94%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

21.86%

-0.08%

NURE vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NURE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

NURE vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison

NURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%0.00%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
4.33%4.56%3.51%3.73%2.80%1.34%3.41%3.28%4.11%3.86%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


NURE and NUMG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUMG has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to NURE (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NURE dropped -46.05% vs NUMG's -38.85%.

On 5-year performance, NURE leads with 1.78% vs -1.19% for NUMG. On fees, NUMG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, NURE has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NURE has performed better with a 1.78% return vs -1.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUMG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NURE.

NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.33%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.

NURE is categorized as REIT, while NUMG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. NURE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index, while NUMG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NURE and 0.30% for NUMG.

NURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NURE and NUMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer