NURE vs. NULV
NURE (Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF) and NULV (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NURE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index, while NULV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NURE returned 2.02%/yr vs 8.68%/yr for NULV. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NURE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for NULV.
Performance
NURE vs. NULV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NURE having a 13.59% return and NULV slightly higher at 13.87%.
NURE
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 13.59%
- 6M
- 16.03%
- 1Y
- 10.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- —
NULV
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- —
NURE vs. NULV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 13.59% | -7.51% | 6.65% | 13.09% | -28.48% | 53.41% | -7.24% | 25.10% | 0.02% | 8.41% |
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF | 13.87% | 16.31% | 11.88% | 7.60% | -10.09% | 23.46% | 1.87% | 27.26% | -4.90% | 15.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between NURE and NULV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2016 | 0.62 |
The correlation between NURE and NULV shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NURE vs. NULV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NURE
NULV
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
NURE
NULV
Basic Materials
NURE
-
NULV
Communication Services
NURE
-
NULV
Consumer Cyclical
NURE
-
NULV
Consumer Defensive
NURE
-
NULV
Energy
NURE
-
NULV
Financial Services
NURE
-
NULV
Healthcare
NURE
-
NULV
Industrials
NURE
-
NULV
Technology
NURE
-
NULV
Utilities
NURE
-
NULV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NURE vs. NULV — Risk / Return Rank
NURE
NULV
NURE vs. NULV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NURE | NULV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.48 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 3.91 | -2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 16.42 | -14.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NURE | NULV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 2.66 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.61 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.61 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
NURE vs. NULV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NURE drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, which is greater than NULV's maximum drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NURE and NULV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NURE | NULV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.05% | -36.99% | -9.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -7.28% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.03% | -15.07% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.98% | -21.47% | -14.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.45% | 0.00% | -10.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.30% | -4.97% | -7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.39% | 1.73% | +2.66% |
Volatility
NURE vs. NULV - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) at 2.52%. This indicates that NURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NULV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NURE | NULV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 2.52% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 7.98% | +3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 10.68% | +5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 14.33% | +5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 17.02% | +4.79% |
NURE vs. NULV - Expense Ratio Comparison
NURE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than NULV's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
NURE vs. NULV - Dividend Comparison
NURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than NULV's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.44% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.55% | 2.12% | 4.52% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 3.73% | 1.22% | 0.00% |
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 4.38% | 4.56% | 3.51% | 3.73% | 2.80% | 1.34% | 3.41% | 3.28% | 4.11% | 3.86% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NURE and NULV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NURE has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to NULV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NURE dropped -46.05% vs NULV's -36.99%.
On 5-year performance, NULV leads with 8.68% vs 2.02% for NURE. On fees, NULV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NULV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NULV has performed better with a 8.68% return vs 2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NULV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NURE.
NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.44% for NULV.
NURE is categorized as REIT, while NULV is Large Cap Value Equities. NURE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index, while NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NURE and 0.26% for NULV.
NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NURE and NULV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer