NURE vs. GSG
NURE (Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - NURE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NURE returned 1.68%/yr vs 14.69%/yr for GSG. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NURE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
NURE vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NURE achieves a 18.91% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 35.21% return.
NURE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 18.91%
- YTD
- 18.91%
- 1Y
- 20.87%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.39%
GSG
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 27.47%
- YTD
- 35.21%
- 1Y
- 38.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.24%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.98M | $16.40M | $25.53M | |
| $89.66K | $88.12K | $134.65K |
NURE vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 18.91% | -7.51% | 6.65% | 13.09% | -28.48% | 53.41% | -7.24% | 25.10% | 0.02% | 8.41% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 35.21% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 24.08% | 38.77% | -23.94% | 15.62% | -13.88% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between NURE and GSG is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016 | 0.08 |
The correlation between NURE and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NURE vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
NURE
GSG
NURE vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NURE | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.06 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 6.61 | -0.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NURE vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NURE drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NURE and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NURE | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.05% | -89.62% | +43.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -18.81% | +9.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.03% | -18.81% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.98% | -29.12% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.25% | -59.18% | +52.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.22% | -63.67% | +51.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 5.85% | -2.16% |
Volatility
NURE vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) is 4.87%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that NURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NURE | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 8.75% | -3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 22.27% | -10.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 24.37% | -8.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 22.89% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 22.07% | -0.35% |
NURE vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NURE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NURE vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
NURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 4.02% | 4.56% | 3.51% | 3.73% | 2.80% | 1.34% | 3.41% | 3.28% | 4.11% | 3.86% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NURE and GSG have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to NURE (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NURE dropped -46.05% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 5-year performance, GSG leads with 14.69% vs 1.68% for NURE. On fees, NURE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NURE has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSG has performed better with a 14.69% return vs 1.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NURE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
NURE is categorized as REIT, while GSG is Commodities. NURE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NURE and 0.75% for GSG.
GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NURE and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer