NUMV vs. NURE
NUMV (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF) and NURE (Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUMV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index, while NURE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NUMV returned 6.55%/yr vs 1.55%/yr for NURE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NUMV charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NURE.
Performance
NUMV vs. NURE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUMV achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly lower than NURE's 11.00% return.
NUMV
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 23.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- —
NURE
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 7.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- —
NUMV vs. NURE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 9.74% | 14.05% | 12.31% | 8.43% | -14.97% | 31.15% | 0.91% | 29.81% | -11.91% | 14.70% |
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 11.00% | -7.51% | 6.65% | 13.09% | -28.48% | 53.41% | -7.24% | 25.10% | 0.02% | 8.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUMV and NURE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2016 | 0.64 |
The correlation between NUMV and NURE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
NUMV vs. NURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NUMV
NURE
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
NUMV
NURE
-
Technology
NUMV
NURE
-
Industrials
NUMV
NURE
-
Real Estate
NUMV
NURE
Consumer Defensive
NUMV
NURE
-
Healthcare
NUMV
NURE
-
Consumer Cyclical
NUMV
NURE
-
Utilities
NUMV
NURE
-
Communication Services
NUMV
NURE
-
Basic Materials
NUMV
NURE
-
Energy
NUMV
NURE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUMV vs. NURE — Risk / Return Rank
NUMV
NURE
NUMV vs. NURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUMV | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.09 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 0.81 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 1.68 | +8.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUMV | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 0.47 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.08 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.27 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
NUMV vs. NURE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUMV drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum NURE drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMV and NURE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUMV | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.46% | -46.05% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -9.13% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.53% | -21.03% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.71% | -35.98% | +10.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -12.49% | +12.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.89% | -12.30% | +5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 4.39% | -2.10% |
Volatility
NUMV vs. NURE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) is 2.97%, while Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that NUMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUMV | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 4.20% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.14% | 11.43% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 15.80% | -3.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 19.65% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 21.80% | -2.03% |
NUMV vs. NURE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUMV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than NURE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUMV vs. NURE - Dividend Comparison
NUMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than NURE's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.40% | 1.53% | 1.81% | 2.20% | 5.78% | 6.62% | 1.38% | 2.40% | 4.01% | 0.83% | 0.00% |
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 4.48% | 4.56% | 3.51% | 3.73% | 2.80% | 1.34% | 3.41% | 3.28% | 4.11% | 3.86% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUMV and NURE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NURE has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to NUMV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMV dropped -43.46% vs NURE's -46.05%.
On 5-year performance, NUMV leads with 6.55% vs 1.55% for NURE. On fees, NUMV is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, NUMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUMV has performed better with a 6.55% return vs 1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUMV is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NURE.
NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 1.40% for NUMV.
NUMV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while NURE is REIT. NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index, while NURE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for NUMV and 0.35% for NURE.
NUMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUMV and NURE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer