PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMV vs. NURE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUMV vs. NURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMV achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly lower than NURE's 11.00% return.


NUMV

1D
-0.42%
1M
4.09%
YTD
9.74%
6M
11.20%
1Y
23.74%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*

NURE

1D
0.55%
1M
4.16%
YTD
11.00%
6M
11.80%
1Y
7.38%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUMV vs. NURE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUMV
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
9.74%14.05%12.31%8.43%-14.97%31.15%0.91%29.81%-11.91%14.70%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
11.00%-7.51%6.65%13.09%-28.48%53.41%-7.24%25.10%0.02%8.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NUMV and NURE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2016

0.64

The correlation between NUMV and NURE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUMV vs. NURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUMV
NURE

Financial Services

18.6%

-

Technology

14.8%

-

Industrials

13.9%

-

Real Estate

8.6%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%

-

Healthcare

8.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%

-

Utilities

6.8%

-

Communication Services

5.5%

-

Basic Materials

4.6%

-

Energy

2.6%

-

Financial Services

NUMV
18.6%
NURE

-

Technology

NUMV
14.8%
NURE

-

Industrials

NUMV
13.9%
NURE

-

Real Estate

NUMV
8.6%
NURE
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

NUMV
8.3%
NURE

-

Healthcare

NUMV
8.2%
NURE

-

Consumer Cyclical

NUMV
8.1%
NURE

-

Utilities

NUMV
6.8%
NURE

-

Communication Services

NUMV
5.5%
NURE

-

Basic Materials

NUMV
4.6%
NURE

-

Energy

NUMV
2.6%
NURE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUMV vs. NURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMV
NUMV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NUMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NURE
NURE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMV vs. NURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUMVNUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.09

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

0.81

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

1.68

+8.69

NUMV vs. NURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the NURE Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMV and NURE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUMVNUREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

0.47

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.08

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.27

+0.18

Drawdowns

NUMV vs. NURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMV drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum NURE drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMV and NURE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMVNUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-46.05%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-9.13%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

-21.03%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.71%

-35.98%

+10.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-12.49%

+12.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-12.30%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

4.39%

-2.10%

Volatility

NUMV vs. NURE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) is 2.97%, while Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that NUMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUMVNUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

4.20%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

11.43%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

15.80%

-3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

19.65%

-2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

21.80%

-2.03%

NUMV vs. NURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than NURE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUMV vs. NURE - Dividend Comparison

NUMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than NURE's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NUMV
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.40%1.53%1.81%2.20%5.78%6.62%1.38%2.40%4.01%0.83%0.00%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
4.48%4.56%3.51%3.73%2.80%1.34%3.41%3.28%4.11%3.86%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUMV and NURE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NURE has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to NUMV (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMV dropped -43.46% vs NURE's -46.05%.

On 5-year performance, NUMV leads with 6.55% vs 1.55% for NURE. On fees, NUMV is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, NUMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NUMV has performed better with a 6.55% return vs 1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUMV is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NURE.

NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 1.40% for NUMV.

NUMV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while NURE is REIT. NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index, while NURE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for NUMV and 0.35% for NURE.

NUMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUMV and NURE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer