PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMV vs. NUDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUMV vs. NUDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) and Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NUMV having a 9.74% return and NUDV slightly lower at 9.63%.


NUMV

1D
-0.42%
1M
4.09%
YTD
9.74%
6M
11.20%
1Y
23.74%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*

NUDV

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.42%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.03%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUMV vs. NUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NUMV
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
9.74%14.05%12.31%8.43%-14.97%7.36%
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
9.63%10.77%14.02%10.13%-7.83%8.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NUMV and NUDV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.93

The correlation between NUMV and NUDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUMV vs. NUDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUMV
NUDV

Financial Services

18.6%
23.2%

Technology

14.8%
13.2%

Industrials

13.9%
12.0%

Real Estate

8.6%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
10.5%

Healthcare

8.2%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
6.7%

Utilities

6.8%
5.8%

Communication Services

5.5%
3.9%

Basic Materials

4.6%
2.7%

Energy

2.6%
5.0%

Financial Services

NUMV
18.6%
NUDV
23.2%

Technology

NUMV
14.8%
NUDV
13.2%

Industrials

NUMV
13.9%
NUDV
12.0%

Real Estate

NUMV
8.6%
NUDV
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

NUMV
8.3%
NUDV
10.5%

Healthcare

NUMV
8.2%
NUDV
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

NUMV
8.1%
NUDV
6.7%

Utilities

NUMV
6.8%
NUDV
5.8%

Communication Services

NUMV
5.5%
NUDV
3.9%

Basic Materials

NUMV
4.6%
NUDV
2.7%

Energy

NUMV
2.6%
NUDV
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUMV vs. NUDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMV
NUMV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
NUMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

NUDV
NUDV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMV vs. NUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) and Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUMVNUDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.84

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

10.08

+0.30

NUMV vs. NUDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the NUDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMV and NUDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUMVNUDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

1.81

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.64

-0.19

Drawdowns

NUMV vs. NUDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMV drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, which is greater than NUDV's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMV and NUDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMVNUDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.46%

-20.10%

-23.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-6.60%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

-16.48%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.72%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-4.92%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

1.85%

+0.44%

Volatility

NUMV vs. NUDV - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) at 2.71%. This indicates that NUMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUMVNUDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.71%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

7.44%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.49%

10.34%

+2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

14.97%

+2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

14.97%

+4.80%

NUMV vs. NUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than NUDV's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUMV vs. NUDV - Dividend Comparison

NUMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than NUDV's 2.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
2.27%2.36%6.18%2.48%2.96%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUMV
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.40%1.53%1.81%2.20%5.78%6.62%1.38%2.40%4.01%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUMV and NUDV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUMV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to NUDV (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMV dropped -43.46% vs NUDV's -20.10%.

On 3-year performance, NUMV leads with 16.96% vs 15.87% for NUDV. On fees, NUDV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NUDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NUMV has performed better with a 16.96% return vs 15.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUDV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for NUMV.

NUDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.40% for NUMV.

NUMV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while NUDV is Large Cap Value Equities. NUMV tracks TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index, while NUDV tracks Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for NUMV and 0.26% for NUDV.

NUMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUMV and NUDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer