NUMI vs. FBDC
NUMI (Nuveen Municipal Income ETF) and FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Nuveen, while FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUMI charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for FBDC.
Performance
NUMI vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUMI achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -9.51% return.
NUMI
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 7.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBDC
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- -9.51%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUMI vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NUMI Nuveen Municipal Income ETF | 1.53% | 4.51% |
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | -9.51% | -2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUMI and FBDC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUMI vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank
NUMI
FBDC
NUMI vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Income ETF (NUMI) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUMI | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.62 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUMI | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | -0.70 | +1.61 |
Drawdowns
NUMI vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUMI drawdown since its inception was -4.72%, smaller than the maximum FBDC drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMI and FBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUMI | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -20.60% | +15.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -17.24% | +16.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -10.14% | +8.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility
NUMI vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUMI | FBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.48% | 18.06% | -14.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 18.06% | -13.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 18.06% | -13.67% |
NUMI vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUMI has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUMI vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison
NUMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than FBDC's 11.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF | 11.52% | 5.41% |
NUMI Nuveen Municipal Income ETF | 3.66% | 3.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUMI and FBDC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NUMI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NUMI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.
FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 3.66% for NUMI.
NUMI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FBDC is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for NUMI and 1.35% for FBDC.
Find the right allocation for NUMI and FBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer