PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUMG vs. NHYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUMG vs. NHYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUMG achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than NHYM's 2.77% return.


NUMG

1D
-1.63%
1M
5.76%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
0.31%
1Y
-0.49%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*

NHYM

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.06%
YTD
2.77%
6M
3.27%
1Y
8.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUMG vs. NHYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NUMG and NHYM is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUMG vs. NHYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

NHYM
NHYM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
NHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUMG vs. NHYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUMGNHYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.41

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

3.18

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.06

9.29

-9.35

NUMG vs. NHYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the NHYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUMG and NHYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUMGNHYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

2.00

-2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.76

-0.32

Drawdowns

NUMG vs. NHYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUMG drawdown since its inception was -38.85%, which is greater than NHYM's maximum drawdown of -6.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUMG and NHYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUMGNHYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.85%

-6.11%

-32.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.71%

-2.77%

-16.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.34%

-0.06%

-9.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.37%

-1.73%

-9.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

0.95%

+6.64%

Volatility

NUMG vs. NHYM - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF (NHYM) at 1.34%. This indicates that NUMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUMGNHYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

1.34%

+3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

2.61%

+11.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.18%

4.39%

+13.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.86%

5.93%

+16.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

5.93%

+15.94%

NUMG vs. NHYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUMG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than NHYM's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUMG vs. NHYM - Dividend Comparison

NUMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than NHYM's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NHYM
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF
4.53%4.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUMG and NHYM have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUMG has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to NHYM (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUMG dropped -38.85% vs NHYM's -6.11%.

On 1-year performance, NHYM leads with 8.76% vs -0.49% for NUMG. On fees, NUMG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, NHYM has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NHYM has performed better with a 8.76% return vs -0.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUMG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NHYM.

NHYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.

NUMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while NHYM is High Yield Muni. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for NUMG and 0.35% for NHYM.

NHYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUMG and NHYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer