PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULV vs. NUSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NULV vs. NUSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NULV vs. NUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.78%16.31%7.03%
NUSB
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF
0.85%4.71%4.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULV achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than NUSB's 0.85% return.


NULV

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.14%
YTD
1.78%
6M
6.21%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
7.40%
10Y*

NUSB

1D
0.01%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.92%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NULV vs. NUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than NUSB's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NULV vs. NUSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

NUSB
NUSB Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
NUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULV vs. NUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULVNUSBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

10.37

-9.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

26.20

-24.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

6.55

-5.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

27.69

-26.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.95

201.92

-195.97

NULV vs. NUSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULV Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the NUSB Sharpe Ratio of 10.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULV and NUSB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULVNUSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

10.37

-9.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

12.48

-11.94

Correlation

The correlation between NULV and NUSB is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NULV vs. NUSB - Dividend Comparison

NULV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than NUSB's 4.37% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.61%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%
NUSB
Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF
4.37%4.51%3.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NULV vs. NUSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULV drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, which is greater than NUSB's maximum drawdown of -0.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULV and NUSB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NULVNUSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.99%

-0.16%

-36.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.32%

-0.16%

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

0.00%

-4.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

0.00%

-5.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

0.02%

+2.52%

Volatility

NULV vs. NUSB - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Nuveen Ultra Short Income ETF (NUSB) at 0.12%. This indicates that NULV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NULVNUSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

0.12%

+4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

0.23%

+7.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.89%

0.42%

+14.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.31%

0.39%

+13.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

0.39%

+16.72%