PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULV vs. NURE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NULV vs. NURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULV achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than NURE's 16.61% return.


NULV

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
10.72%
6M
9.48%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*

NURE

1D
0.96%
1M
5.10%
YTD
16.61%
6M
16.53%
1Y
14.60%
3Y*
7.02%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULV vs. NURE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
10.72%16.31%11.88%7.60%-10.09%23.46%1.87%27.26%-4.90%15.67%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
16.61%-7.51%6.65%13.09%-28.48%53.41%-7.24%25.10%0.02%8.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NULV and NURE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.62

The correlation between NULV and NURE shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NULV vs. NURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NURE
NURE Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULV vs. NURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NULVNUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.16

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

1.61

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

3.34

+9.38

NULV vs. NURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULV Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the NURE Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULV and NURE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NULV vs. NURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULV drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, smaller than the maximum NURE drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULV and NURE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULVNUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.99%

-46.05%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-9.13%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

-21.03%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

-35.98%

+14.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-8.06%

+5.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-12.28%

+7.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

4.38%

-2.58%

Volatility

NULV vs. NURE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) is 3.28%, while Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that NULV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULVNUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

4.36%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

11.60%

-3.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

16.02%

-5.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

19.68%

-5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

21.77%

-4.78%

NULV vs. NURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than NURE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

NULV vs. NURE - Dividend Comparison

NULV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than NURE's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.48%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%0.00%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
4.26%4.56%3.51%3.73%2.80%1.34%3.41%3.28%4.11%3.86%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


NULV and NURE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NURE has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to NULV (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULV dropped -36.99% vs NURE's -46.05%.

On 5-year performance, NULV leads with 8.42% vs 1.96% for NURE. On fees, NULV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NULV has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NULV has performed better with a 8.42% return vs 1.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NURE.

NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 1.48% for NULV.

NULV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NURE is REIT. NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value, while NURE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NULV and 0.35% for NURE.

NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NULV and NURE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer