NULV vs. NURE
NULV (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF) and NURE (Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NULV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value, while NURE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NULV returned 8.68%/yr vs 2.02%/yr for NURE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NULV charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NURE.
Performance
NULV vs. NURE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NULV having a 13.87% return and NURE slightly lower at 13.59%.
NULV
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- —
NURE
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 13.59%
- 6M
- 16.03%
- 1Y
- 10.17%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- —
NULV vs. NURE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF | 13.87% | 16.31% | 11.88% | 7.60% | -10.09% | 23.46% | 1.87% | 27.26% | -4.90% | 15.67% |
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 13.59% | -7.51% | 6.65% | 13.09% | -28.48% | 53.41% | -7.24% | 25.10% | 0.02% | 8.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between NULV and NURE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2016 | 0.62 |
The correlation between NULV and NURE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NULV vs. NURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NULV
NURE
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
NULV
NURE
-
Financial Services
NULV
NURE
-
Communication Services
NULV
NURE
-
Healthcare
NULV
NURE
-
Industrials
NULV
NURE
-
Consumer Defensive
NULV
NURE
-
Energy
NULV
NURE
-
Consumer Cyclical
NULV
NURE
-
Utilities
NULV
NURE
-
Real Estate
NULV
NURE
Basic Materials
NULV
NURE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NULV vs. NURE — Risk / Return Rank
NULV
NURE
NULV vs. NURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NULV | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.12 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 1.12 | +2.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.42 | 2.32 | +14.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NULV | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 0.64 | +2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.10 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.28 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
NULV vs. NURE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NULV drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, smaller than the maximum NURE drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULV and NURE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NULV | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.99% | -46.05% | +9.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.28% | -9.13% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.07% | -21.03% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.47% | -35.98% | +14.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.45% | +10.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -12.30% | +7.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 4.39% | -2.66% |
Volatility
NULV vs. NURE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) is 2.52%, while Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that NULV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NULV | NURE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 4.58% | -2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.98% | 11.65% | -3.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.68% | 15.95% | -5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 19.67% | -5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 21.81% | -4.79% |
NULV vs. NURE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NULV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than NURE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NULV vs. NURE - Dividend Comparison
NULV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than NURE's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.44% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.55% | 2.12% | 4.52% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 3.73% | 1.22% | 0.00% |
NURE Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF | 4.38% | 4.56% | 3.51% | 3.73% | 2.80% | 1.34% | 3.41% | 3.28% | 4.11% | 3.86% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NULV and NURE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NURE has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to NULV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULV dropped -36.99% vs NURE's -46.05%.
On 5-year performance, NULV leads with 8.68% vs 2.02% for NURE. On fees, NULV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NULV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NULV has performed better with a 8.68% return vs 2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NULV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NURE.
NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.44% for NULV.
NULV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NURE is REIT. NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value, while NURE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Short-Term REIT Index. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NULV and 0.35% for NURE.
NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NULV and NURE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer