PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULV vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NULV vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULV achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 48.11% return.


NULV

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
10.72%
6M
9.48%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*

DBO

1D
2.90%
1M
-17.26%
YTD
48.11%
6M
46.08%
1Y
41.77%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULV vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
10.72%16.31%11.88%7.60%-10.09%23.46%1.87%27.26%-4.90%15.67%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
48.11%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between NULV and DBO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2016

0.19

The correlation between NULV and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NULV vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULV
NULV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULV vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NULVDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.22

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

1.60

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

4.78

+7.94

NULV vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULV Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULV and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NULV vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULV drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULV and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULVDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.99%

-90.18%

+53.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-26.22%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

-28.20%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.47%

-37.68%

+16.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-61.02%

+58.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-62.22%

+57.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

8.77%

-6.97%

Volatility

NULV vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) is 3.28%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that NULV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULVDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

11.32%

-8.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

29.75%

-21.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.84%

34.39%

-23.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

32.61%

-18.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

31.84%

-14.85%

NULV vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

NULV vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

NULV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than DBO's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
2.37%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%
NULV
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
1.48%1.64%2.09%2.55%2.12%4.52%1.42%1.47%3.73%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NULV and DBO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to NULV (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULV dropped -36.99% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 9.72% vs 8.42% for NULV. On fees, NULV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NULV has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 9.72% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NULV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.48% for NULV.

NULV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NULV and 0.78% for DBO.

NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NULV and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer