NULG vs. USSG
NULG (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF) and USSG (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - NULG tracks the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth while USSG tracks the MSCI USA ESG Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NULG returned 14.66%/yr vs 14.04%/yr for USSG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NULG charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for USSG.
Performance
NULG vs. USSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NULG achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than USSG's 10.71% return.
NULG
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 8.41%
- YTD
- 16.76%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 26.42%
- 3Y*
- 24.67%
- 5Y*
- 14.66%
- 10Y*
- —
USSG
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 29.11%
- 3Y*
- 22.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- —
NULG vs. USSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NULG Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF | 16.76% | 14.07% | 23.75% | 42.71% | -28.43% | 28.06% | 39.58% | 24.00% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 10.71% | 18.97% | 23.45% | 29.17% | -20.33% | 31.83% | 18.71% | 19.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between NULG and USSG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between NULG and USSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
NULG vs. USSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NULG
USSG
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
NULG
USSG
Consumer Cyclical
NULG
USSG
Industrials
NULG
USSG
Financial Services
NULG
USSG
Communication Services
NULG
USSG
Healthcare
NULG
USSG
Consumer Defensive
NULG
USSG
Basic Materials
NULG
USSG
Real Estate
NULG
USSG
Energy
NULG
-
USSG
Utilities
NULG
-
USSG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NULG vs. USSG — Risk / Return Rank
NULG
USSG
NULG vs. USSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NULG | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.39 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.61 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.22 | 11.19 | -4.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NULG | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.22 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.80 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.85 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
NULG vs. USSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NULG drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than USSG's maximum drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULG and USSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NULG | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.17% | -34.10% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.50% | -11.20% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | -20.00% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.17% | -27.00% | -9.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -0.12% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -5.60% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 2.61% | +1.65% |
Volatility
NULG vs. USSG - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) at 3.86%. This indicates that NULG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NULG | USSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 3.86% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.55% | 10.09% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 13.15% | +3.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 17.59% | +3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 20.16% | +1.23% |
NULG vs. USSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NULG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than USSG's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NULG vs. USSG - Dividend Comparison
NULG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than USSG's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NULG Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.10% | 0.11% | 0.16% | 0.43% | 0.40% | 5.08% | 2.68% | 1.10% | 3.73% | 0.61% |
USSG Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 0.94% | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.13% | 1.42% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NULG and USSG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NULG has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to USSG (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULG dropped -36.17% vs USSG's -34.10%.
On 5-year performance, NULG leads with 14.66% vs 14.04% for USSG. On fees, USSG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USSG has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NULG has performed better with a 14.66% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USSG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NULG.
USSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.10% for NULG.
NULG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth, while USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NULG and 0.10% for USSG.
USSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NULG and USSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer