PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NULG vs. USSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NULG vs. USSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NULG achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than USSG's 10.71% return.


NULG

1D
-0.39%
1M
8.41%
YTD
16.76%
6M
15.85%
1Y
26.42%
3Y*
24.67%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*

USSG

1D
1.10%
1M
5.20%
YTD
10.71%
6M
11.08%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NULG vs. USSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
16.76%14.07%23.75%42.71%-28.43%28.06%39.58%24.00%
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
10.71%18.97%23.45%29.17%-20.33%31.83%18.71%19.24%

Correlation

The correlation between NULG and USSG is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.93

The correlation between NULG and USSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

NULG vs. USSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NULG
USSG

Technology

56.5%
36.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
8.6%

Industrials

9.4%
8.1%

Financial Services

7.1%
10.6%

Communication Services

6.5%
14.5%

Healthcare

5.5%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
4.2%

Basic Materials

1.9%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.2%

Energy

-

2.1%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Technology

NULG
56.5%
USSG
36.9%

Consumer Cyclical

NULG
9.8%
USSG
8.6%

Industrials

NULG
9.4%
USSG
8.1%

Financial Services

NULG
7.1%
USSG
10.6%

Communication Services

NULG
6.5%
USSG
14.5%

Healthcare

NULG
5.5%
USSG
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

NULG
2.1%
USSG
4.2%

Basic Materials

NULG
1.9%
USSG
2.1%

Real Estate

NULG
1.2%
USSG
2.2%

Energy

NULG

-

USSG
2.1%

Utilities

NULG

-

USSG
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NULG vs. USSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NULG
NULG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NULG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NULG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

USSG
USSG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
USSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
USSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NULG vs. USSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NULGUSSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.61

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

11.19

-4.97

NULG vs. USSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NULG Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the USSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NULG and USSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NULGUSSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

2.22

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.80

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.85

+0.05

Drawdowns

NULG vs. USSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NULG drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than USSG's maximum drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NULG and USSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NULGUSSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-34.10%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-11.20%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-20.00%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

-27.00%

-9.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.12%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-5.60%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

2.61%

+1.65%

Volatility

NULG vs. USSG - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) at 3.86%. This indicates that NULG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NULGUSSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

3.86%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

10.09%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.01%

13.15%

+3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.51%

17.59%

+3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.39%

20.16%

+1.23%

NULG vs. USSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NULG has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than USSG's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NULG vs. USSG - Dividend Comparison

NULG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than USSG's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.10%0.11%0.16%0.43%0.40%5.08%2.68%1.10%3.73%0.61%
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
0.94%1.02%1.13%1.60%1.52%1.13%1.42%1.21%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NULG and USSG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NULG has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to USSG (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NULG dropped -36.17% vs USSG's -34.10%.

On 5-year performance, NULG leads with 14.66% vs 14.04% for USSG. On fees, USSG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USSG has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NULG has performed better with a 14.66% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USSG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NULG.

USSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.10% for NULG.

NULG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Growth, while USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NULG and 0.10% for USSG.

USSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NULG and USSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer