PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUKL.DE vs. IQQH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUKL.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUKL.DE achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly lower than IQQH.DE's 39.28% return.


NUKL.DE

1D
0.87%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
11.67%
6M
4.20%
1Y
50.82%
3Y*
41.91%
5Y*
10Y*

IQQH.DE

1D
-1.81%
1M
8.24%
YTD
39.28%
6M
36.90%
1Y
77.84%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
11.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKL.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NUKL.DE
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A
11.67%51.50%38.03%24.46%
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
39.28%29.83%-21.49%-22.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKL.DE and IQQH.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2023

0.40

The correlation between NUKL.DE and IQQH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUKL.DE vs. IQQH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKL.DE
NUKL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NUKL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQH.DE
IQQH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKL.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUKL.DEIQQH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.50

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

6.29

-4.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

19.88

-15.45

NUKL.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the IQQH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKL.DE and IQQH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUKL.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

3.18

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

-0.01

+1.11

Drawdowns

NUKL.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKL.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.52%, smaller than the maximum IQQH.DE drawdown of -86.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKL.DE and IQQH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUKL.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.52%

-86.09%

+48.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.12%

-12.32%

-14.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.52%

-44.74%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.83%

-24.01%

+11.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

-59.78%

+51.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.43%

3.90%

+7.53%

Volatility

NUKL.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.05% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) at 9.79%. This indicates that NUKL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUKL.DEIQQH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.05%

9.79%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.97%

18.31%

+10.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.82%

24.37%

+17.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.24%

24.69%

+9.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.24%

25.08%

+9.16%

NUKL.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKL.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQH.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUKL.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Dividend Comparison

NUKL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IQQH.DE
iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.94%1.53%1.32%1.23%0.83%1.23%0.56%2.89%3.30%4.82%4.72%2.86%
NUKL.DE
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUKL.DE and IQQH.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NUKL.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NUKL.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

NUKL.DE tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, while IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NUKL.DE and 0.65% for IQQH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUKL.DE and IQQH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer