PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUKL.DE vs. CC1U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUKL.DE vs. CC1U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) and Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NUKL.DE is traded in EUR, while CC1U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CC1U.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NUKL.DE having a -8.46% return and CC1U.L slightly lower at -8.64%.


NUKL.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-15.49%
6M
-25.07%
YTD
-8.46%
1Y
2.25%
3Y*
33.29%
5Y*
10Y*

CC1U.L

1D
-3.41%
1M
-9.45%
6M
-14.77%
YTD
-8.64%
1Y
6.65%
3Y*
0.83%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUKL.DE vs. CC1U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NUKL.DE
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A
-8.46%51.50%38.03%15.17%
CC1U.L
Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD
-8.64%22.93%8.24%-20.12%

Correlation

The correlation between NUKL.DE and CC1U.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023

0.31

The correlation between NUKL.DE and CC1U.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUKL.DE vs. CC1U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUKL.DE
NUKL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
NUKL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CC1U.L
CC1U.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CC1U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CC1U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CC1U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CC1U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CC1U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUKL.DE vs. CC1U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) and Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUKL.DECC1U.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.07

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

0.36

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

0.77

-0.50

NUKL.DE vs. CC1U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUKL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the CC1U.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUKL.DE and CC1U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUKL.DE vs. CC1U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUKL.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.52%, smaller than the maximum CC1U.L drawdown of -40.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKL.DE and CC1U.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUKL.DECC1U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.52%

-40.70%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.54%

-18.43%

-10.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.52%

-38.24%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.54%

-18.43%

-10.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-13.42%

+4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.55%

8.61%

+4.94%

Volatility

NUKL.DE vs. CC1U.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) and Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) have volatilities of 8.21% and 7.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUKL.DECC1U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

7.90%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.78%

16.37%

+12.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.02%

23.90%

+18.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.53%

26.44%

+8.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.53%

24.94%

+9.59%

NUKL.DE vs. CC1U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUKL.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CC1U.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUKL.DE vs. CC1U.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither NUKL.DE nor CC1U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


NUKL.DE and CC1U.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CC1U.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CC1U.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NUKL.DE.

NUKL.DE is categorized as Uranium, while CC1U.L is China Equities. NUKL.DE tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, while CC1U.L tracks MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NUKL.DE and 0.45% for CC1U.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUKL.DE and CC1U.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer