NUKL.DE vs. 4GLD.DE
NUKL.DE (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A) and 4GLD.DE (Xetra-Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - NUKL.DE is a Uranium fund tracking the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, while 4GLD.DE is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NUKL.DE returned 41.91%/yr vs 26.47%/yr for 4GLD.DE. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUKL.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for 4GLD.DE.
Performance
NUKL.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUKL.DE achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly higher than 4GLD.DE's -2.63% return.
NUKL.DE
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 37.72%
- 3Y*
- 41.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
4GLD.DE
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 23.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
NUKL.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NUKL.DE VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A | 11.67% | 51.50% | 38.03% | 23.67% |
4GLD.DE Xetra-Gold | -2.63% | 49.32% | 34.57% | 6.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUKL.DE and 4GLD.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023 | 0.21 |
The correlation between NUKL.DE and 4GLD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUKL.DE vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NUKL.DE
4GLD.DE
NUKL.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUKL.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 1.12 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 3.41 | +1.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUKL.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUKL.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.52%, roughly equal to the maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUKL.DE and 4GLD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUKL.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.52% | -36.79% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.12% | -21.73% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.52% | -21.73% | -15.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.83% | -19.44% | +6.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.79% | -12.03% | +4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.43% | 7.11% | +4.32% |
Volatility
NUKL.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF A (NUKL.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.05% compared to Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) at 6.93%. This indicates that NUKL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUKL.DE | 4GLD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.05% | 6.93% | +4.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.97% | 20.81% | +8.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.82% | 23.70% | +18.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.22% | 16.29% | +17.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.22% | 14.56% | +19.66% |
NUKL.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUKL.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUKL.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither NUKL.DE nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NUKL.DE and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for NUKL.DE.
NUKL.DE is categorized as Uranium, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. NUKL.DE tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure, while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NUKL.DE and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.
Find the right allocation for NUKL.DE and 4GLD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer