NUGY vs. BSMS
NUGY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Gold Miners ETF) and BSMS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NUGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BSMS is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2028 Index. NUGY is actively managed, while BSMS is passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUGY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMS.
Performance
NUGY vs. BSMS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUGY achieves a -6.33% return, which is significantly lower than BSMS's 1.16% return.
NUGY
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -6.33%
- 6M
- -12.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSMS
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 2.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.14%
- 10Y*
- —
NUGY vs. BSMS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NUGY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Gold Miners ETF | -6.33% | 3.20% |
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.16% | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUGY and BSMS is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUGY vs. BSMS — Risk / Return Rank
NUGY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSMS
NUGY vs. BSMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Gold Miners ETF (NUGY) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUGY | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.56 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUGY vs. BSMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUGY drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, which is greater than BSMS's maximum drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGY and BSMS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUGY | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.10% | -14.95% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.71% | -0.76% | -17.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -4.93% | -3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.37% | — |
Volatility
NUGY vs. BSMS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUGY | BSMS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.91% | 1.52% | +24.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 3.59% | +22.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 6.18% | +19.73% |
NUGY vs. BSMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUGY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMS's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUGY vs. BSMS - Dividend Comparison
NUGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.61%, more than BSMS's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMS Invesco BulletShares 2028 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.77% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 1.49% | 1.61% | 0.46% |
NUGY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Gold Miners ETF | 83.61% | 12.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUGY and BSMS have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSMS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSMS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NUGY.
NUGY has the higher dividend yield at 83.61%, compared with 2.77% for BSMS.
NUGY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BSMS is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NUGY and 0.18% for BSMS.
Find the right allocation for NUGY and BSMS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer