PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUGO vs. NURE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUGO vs. NURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Growth Opportunities ETF (NUGO) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUGO achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly lower than NURE's 11.00% return.


NUGO

1D
-1.39%
1M
5.87%
YTD
10.24%
6M
9.17%
1Y
27.74%
3Y*
25.96%
5Y*
10Y*

NURE

1D
0.55%
1M
4.16%
YTD
11.00%
6M
11.80%
1Y
7.38%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUGO vs. NURE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NUGO
Nuveen Growth Opportunities ETF
10.24%14.91%35.95%45.37%-32.73%7.78%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
11.00%-7.51%6.65%13.09%-28.48%14.79%

Correlation

The correlation between NUGO and NURE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between NUGO and NURE has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NUGO vs. NURE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUGO
NURE

Technology

54.6%

-

Communication Services

13.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%

-

Industrials

9.0%

-

Healthcare

6.5%

-

Financial Services

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%

-

Utilities

0.2%

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

100.0%

Technology

NUGO
54.6%
NURE

-

Communication Services

NUGO
13.2%
NURE

-

Consumer Cyclical

NUGO
12.3%
NURE

-

Industrials

NUGO
9.0%
NURE

-

Healthcare

NUGO
6.5%
NURE

-

Financial Services

NUGO
3.3%
NURE

-

Basic Materials

NUGO
1.6%
NURE

-

Consumer Defensive

NUGO
0.9%
NURE

-

Utilities

NUGO
0.2%
NURE

-

Energy

NUGO

-

NURE

-

Real Estate

NUGO

-

NURE
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUGO vs. NURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUGO
NUGO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
NUGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

NURE
NURE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NURE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NURE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUGO vs. NURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Growth Opportunities ETF (NUGO) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUGONUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.09

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

0.81

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.17

1.68

+3.49

NUGO vs. NURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the NURE Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUGO and NURE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUGONUREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

0.47

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.27

+0.32

Drawdowns

NUGO vs. NURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUGO drawdown since its inception was -38.01%, smaller than the maximum NURE drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUGO and NURE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUGONUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.01%

-46.05%

+8.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.54%

-9.13%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.12%

-21.03%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-12.49%

+11.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.06%

-12.30%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.38%

4.39%

+0.99%

Volatility

NUGO vs. NURE - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Growth Opportunities ETF (NUGO) and Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF (NURE) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUGONUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

4.20%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.36%

11.43%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.71%

15.80%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.12%

19.65%

+3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.12%

21.80%

+1.32%

NUGO vs. NURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUGO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than NURE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUGO vs. NURE - Dividend Comparison

NUGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NUGO
Nuveen Growth Opportunities ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.19%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NURE
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF
4.48%4.56%3.51%3.73%2.80%1.34%3.41%3.28%4.11%3.86%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUGO and NURE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUGO has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to NURE (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUGO dropped -38.01% vs NURE's -46.05%.

On 3-year performance, NUGO leads with 25.96% vs 4.66% for NURE. On fees, NURE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NUGO has performed better with a 25.96% return vs 4.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NURE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NUGO.

NURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 0.00% for NUGO.

NUGO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while NURE is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NUGO and 0.35% for NURE.

NUGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUGO and NURE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer