PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUG vs. PLTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUG vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF (NUG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUG achieves a -38.20% return, which is significantly higher than PLTG's -63.05% return.


NUG

1D
-2.32%
1M
9.27%
6M
-43.84%
YTD
-38.20%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

PLTG

1D
1.90%
1M
-11.61%
6M
-44.23%
YTD
-63.05%
1Y
-58.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-21.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$95.16K$98.38K$124.99K
$2.36M$3.34M$5.05M

NUG vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NUG and PLTG is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUG vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NUG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PLTG
PLTG Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NUG vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF (NUG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NUGPLTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

NUG vs. PLTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NUG vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUG drawdown since its inception was -66.15%, smaller than the maximum PLTG drawdown of -80.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUG and PLTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUGPLTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.15%

-80.11%

+13.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.00%

-74.89%

+24.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.24%

-35.51%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.28%

Volatility

NUG vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUGPLTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

82.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.01%

104.68%

-25.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.01%

105.88%

-26.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.01%

105.88%

-26.87%

NUG vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NUG and PLTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

NUG vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison

NUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.09%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NUG and PLTG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NUG and PLTG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 49.09%, compared with 0.00% for NUG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUG and PLTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer