NUG vs. IFED
NUG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NUG is actively managed, while IFED is passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
NUG vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUG achieves a -49.34% return, which is significantly lower than IFED's -3.02% return.
NUG
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- -49.34%
- 6M
- -48.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFED
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- -3.02%
- 6M
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUG vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NUG Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF | -49.34% | 9.30% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -3.02% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUG and IFED is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUG vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
NUG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IFED
NUG vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NU Daily ETF (NUG) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.05 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUG vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUG drawdown since its inception was -66.15%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUG and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.15% | -22.36% | -43.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.01% | -5.00% | -54.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.80% | -5.83% | -25.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.87% | — |
Volatility
NUG vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUG | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.90% | 16.87% | +63.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.90% | 19.92% | +59.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.90% | 19.92% | +59.98% |
NUG vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUG vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
Neither NUG nor IFED has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NUG and IFED have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NUG.
NUG and IFED have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NUG and 0.45% for IFED.
Find the right allocation for NUG and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer