NUESX vs. NOBOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund (NUESX) and Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX).
NUESX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Oct 2, 2017. NOBOX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Feb 27, 2007.
Performance
NUESX vs. NOBOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NUESX vs. NOBOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUESX Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund | -7.73% | 15.33% | 20.67% | 25.22% | -18.85% | 31.26% | 20.20% | 31.40% | -4.71% |
NOBOX Northern Bond Index Fund | -0.24% | 6.14% | 0.82% | 4.86% | -13.84% | -2.10% | 7.20% | 8.73% | 1.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUESX achieves a -7.73% return, which is significantly lower than NOBOX's -0.24% return.
NUESX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -7.73%
- 6M
- -5.35%
- 1Y
- 12.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- —
NOBOX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.81%
- 5Y*
- -0.46%
- 10Y*
- 1.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NUESX vs. NOBOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUESX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBOX's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NUESX vs. NOBOX — Risk / Return Rank
NUESX
NOBOX
NUESX vs. NOBOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund (NUESX) and Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NUESX | NOBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.94 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.40 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 1.61 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 4.70 | -1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NUESX | NOBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.94 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | -0.08 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.59 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between NUESX and NOBOX is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NUESX vs. NOBOX - Dividend Comparison
NUESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.79%, more than NOBOX's 3.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUESX Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund | 13.79% | 12.68% | 1.50% | 1.54% | 3.71% | 5.97% | 1.60% | 1.62% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBOX Northern Bond Index Fund | 3.98% | 2.88% | 3.46% | 2.63% | 1.53% | 2.10% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 2.80% | 2.77% | 2.45% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
NUESX vs. NOBOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUESX drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, which is greater than NOBOX's maximum drawdown of -20.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUESX and NOBOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUESX | NOBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.33% | -20.03% | -13.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -2.80% | -9.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.96% | -19.15% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.41% | -6.19% | -3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.31% | -3.52% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 0.96% | +2.09% |
Volatility
NUESX vs. NOBOX - Volatility Comparison
Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund (NUESX) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) at 1.62%. This indicates that NUESX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NUESX | NOBOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.30% | 1.62% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 2.87% | +6.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.71% | 4.60% | +15.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 6.07% | +11.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 5.01% | +14.74% |