PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUESX vs. GQEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NUESX vs. GQEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund (NUESX) and GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund (GQEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NUESX vs. GQEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NUESX
Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund
-5.00%15.33%20.67%25.22%-18.85%31.26%20.20%31.40%-14.24%
GQEIX
GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund
9.61%-4.31%29.20%17.77%-2.69%19.88%23.88%27.34%-7.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUESX achieves a -5.00% return, which is significantly lower than GQEIX's 9.61% return.


NUESX

1D
2.96%
1M
-5.00%
YTD
-5.00%
6M
-2.83%
1Y
15.06%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*

GQEIX

1D
-0.18%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
9.61%
6M
8.10%
1Y
5.59%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NUESX vs. GQEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUESX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GQEIX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NUESX vs. GQEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUESX
NUESX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NUESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUESX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NUESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUESX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GQEIX
GQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUESX vs. GQEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund (NUESX) and GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund (GQEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUESXGQEIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

0.45

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

0.69

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.09

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

0.77

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.33

1.97

+2.37

NUESX vs. GQEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUESX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the GQEIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUESX and GQEIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUESXGQEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

0.45

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.79

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.76

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between NUESX and GQEIX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NUESX vs. GQEIX - Dividend Comparison

NUESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.39%, more than GQEIX's 6.73% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NUESX
Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund
13.39%12.68%1.50%1.54%3.71%5.97%1.60%1.62%2.44%
GQEIX
GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund
6.73%7.38%5.41%0.63%4.50%1.50%0.67%0.65%0.12%

Drawdowns

NUESX vs. GQEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUESX drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, which is greater than GQEIX's maximum drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUESX and GQEIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NUESXGQEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.33%

-28.48%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-8.30%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.96%

-20.44%

-4.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.72%

-6.26%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-5.69%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.40%

-0.53%

Volatility

NUESX vs. GQEIX - Volatility Comparison

Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund (NUESX) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity Fund (GQEIX) at 2.76%. This indicates that NUESX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NUESXGQEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

2.76%

+2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

7.32%

+2.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.89%

12.44%

+7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

15.88%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

18.88%

+0.90%