NUESX vs. FQITX
NUESX (Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund) and FQITX (Fidelity SAI International Quality Index Fund) are both Quality Factor funds. Over the past 5 years, NUESX returned 10.67%/yr vs 5.75%/yr for FQITX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NUESX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FQITX.
Performance
NUESX vs. FQITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NUESX achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than FQITX's 11.52% return.
NUESX
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 7.01%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 1Y
- 17.04%
- 3Y*
- 16.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.15%
FQITX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 1Y
- 20.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NUESX vs. FQITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NUESX Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund | 8.00% | 15.33% | 20.67% | 25.22% | -18.85% | 31.26% | 29.72% |
FQITX Fidelity SAI International Quality Index Fund | 11.52% | 17.04% | 1.04% | 18.44% | -17.12% | 14.00% | 29.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between NUESX and FQITX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between NUESX and FQITX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NUESX vs. FQITX — Risk / Return Rank
NUESX
FQITX
NUESX vs. FQITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund (NUESX) and Fidelity SAI International Quality Index Fund (FQITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NUESX | FQITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.48 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.34 | 5.34 | +2.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NUESX vs. FQITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NUESX drawdown since its inception was -33.33%, which is greater than FQITX's maximum drawdown of -31.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUESX and FQITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NUESX | FQITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.33% | -31.39% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | -12.89% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.41% | -15.68% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.96% | -31.39% | +6.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | 0.00% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -6.70% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 3.56% | -1.33% |
Volatility
NUESX vs. FQITX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund (NUESX) is 3.31%, while Fidelity SAI International Quality Index Fund (FQITX) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that NUESX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQITX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NUESX | FQITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 3.90% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.00% | 13.84% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.09% | 16.65% | -3.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 16.81% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 16.41% | +3.13% |
NUESX vs. FQITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NUESX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FQITX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
NUESX vs. FQITX - Dividend Comparison
NUESX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, more than FQITX's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQITX Fidelity SAI International Quality Index Fund | 1.83% | 2.04% | 1.60% | 2.54% | 3.13% | 11.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUESX Northern U.S. Quality ESG Fund | 11.54% | 12.68% | 1.50% | 1.54% | 3.71% | 5.97% | 1.60% | 1.62% | 2.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NUESX and FQITX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FQITX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to NUESX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUESX dropped -33.33% vs FQITX's -31.39%.
NUESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NUESX and FQITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer