PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDV vs. NUMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUDV vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUDV achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly higher than NUMG's -0.40% return.


NUDV

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.42%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.03%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
10Y*

NUMG

1D
-1.63%
1M
5.76%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
0.31%
1Y
-0.49%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUDV vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
9.63%10.77%14.02%10.13%-7.83%8.92%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
-0.40%0.78%11.99%20.47%-28.31%1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDV and NUMG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between NUDV and NUMG has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NUDV vs. NUMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NUDV
NUMG

Financial Services

23.2%
6.5%

Technology

13.2%
28.7%

Industrials

12.0%
26.5%

Healthcare

11.3%
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

10.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
11.8%

Real Estate

5.8%
3.7%

Utilities

5.8%
1.4%

Energy

5.0%

-

Communication Services

3.9%
5.2%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.3%

Financial Services

NUDV
23.2%
NUMG
6.5%

Technology

NUDV
13.2%
NUMG
28.7%

Industrials

NUDV
12.0%
NUMG
26.5%

Healthcare

NUDV
11.3%
NUMG
13.9%

Consumer Defensive

NUDV
10.5%
NUMG

-

Consumer Cyclical

NUDV
6.7%
NUMG
11.8%

Real Estate

NUDV
5.8%
NUMG
3.7%

Utilities

NUDV
5.8%
NUMG
1.4%

Energy

NUDV
5.0%
NUMG

-

Communication Services

NUDV
3.9%
NUMG
5.2%

Basic Materials

NUDV
2.7%
NUMG
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUDV vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDV
NUDV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

NUMG
NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDV vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUDVNUMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

-0.03

+1.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

0.09

+2.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.01

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

-0.03

+2.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.08

-0.06

+10.14

NUDV vs. NUMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the NUMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDV and NUMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUDVNUMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

-0.03

+1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.44

+0.20

Drawdowns

NUDV vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDV drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, smaller than the maximum NUMG drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDV and NUMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDVNUMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-38.85%

+18.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-19.71%

+13.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

-26.58%

+10.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-9.34%

+8.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-11.37%

+6.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

7.59%

-5.74%

Volatility

NUDV vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) is 2.71%, while Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that NUDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUDVNUMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

4.75%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

14.59%

-7.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

18.18%

-7.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

22.86%

-7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

21.87%

-6.90%

NUDV vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

NUDV vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison

NUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
2.27%2.36%6.18%2.48%2.96%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUMG
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.01%0.01%0.06%0.18%0.18%12.76%3.82%0.27%5.14%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUDV and NUMG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUMG has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to NUDV (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDV dropped -20.10% vs NUMG's -38.85%.

On 3-year performance, NUDV leads with 15.87% vs 8.47% for NUMG. On fees, NUDV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NUDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NUDV has performed better with a 15.87% return vs 8.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUDV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUMG.

NUDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.

NUDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NUMG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. NUDV tracks Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index, while NUMG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NUDV and 0.30% for NUMG.

NUDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUDV and NUMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer