NUDV vs. NULV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NUDV (Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF) and NULV (Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds from Nuveen - NUDV tracks the Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index while NULV tracks the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NUDV returned 15.78%/yr vs 16.40%/yr for NULV. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.26% expense ratio.

Performance

NUDV vs. NULV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NUDV having a 10.57% return and NULV slightly higher at 10.77%.

NUDV

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 6M: 9.45%
• 1Y: 18.55%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NULV

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -1.46%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 9.53%
• 1Y: 22.16%
• 3Y*: 16.40%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUDV vs. NULV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NUDV Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF	10.57%	10.77%	14.02%	10.13%	-7.83%	8.35%
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF	10.77%	16.31%	11.88%	7.60%	-10.09%	5.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDV and NULV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021	0.96

The correlation between NUDV and NULV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

NUDV vs. NULV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NUDV	NULV
Financial Services	22.4%	21.0%
Industrials	18.2%	12.0%
Healthcare	13.7%	14.6%
Technology	11.8%	13.4%
Consumer Defensive	9.3%	10.2%
Real Estate	6.8%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	5.7%
Utilities	3.6%	5.3%
Communication Services	3.2%	5.1%
Energy	2.5%	4.6%
Basic Materials	2.2%	3.2%

Return for Risk

NUDV vs. NULV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDV

NUDV Risk / Return Rank: 62
NUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
NUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
NUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
NUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
NUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 63

NULV

NULV Risk / Return Rank: 72
NULV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
NULV Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
NULV Omega Ratio Rank: 70
NULV Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
NULV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDV vs. NULV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUDV	NULV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.05	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	2.92	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.37	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	3.06	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.03	12.39	-2.36

NUDV vs. NULV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the NULV Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDV and NULV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NUDV vs. NULV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDV drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, smaller than the maximum NULV drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDV and NULV.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUDV	NULV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.10%	-36.99%	+16.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.60%	-7.28%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.48%	-15.07%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-2.73%	+1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.87%	-4.96%	+0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	1.79%	+0.06%

Volatility

NUDV vs. NULV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) is 2.99%, while Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF (NULV) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that NUDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NULV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUDV	NULV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	3.34%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.65%	8.30%	-0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.41%	10.88%	-0.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.93%	14.33%	+0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	17.00%	-2.07%

NUDV vs. NULV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NUDV and NULV have an expense ratio of 0.26%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NUDV vs. NULV - Dividend Comparison

NUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than NULV's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NUDV Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF	2.26%	2.36%	6.18%	2.48%	2.96%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NULV Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF	1.48%	1.64%	2.09%	2.55%	2.12%	4.52%	1.42%	1.47%	3.73%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUDV and NULV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, NUDV and NULV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NUDV or NULV?

NULV has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to NUDV (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDV dropped -20.10% vs NULV's -36.99%.

Which ETF is better, NUDV or NULV?

On 3-year performance, NULV leads with 16.40% vs 15.78% for NUDV. Both ETFs have the same 0.26% expense ratio. On volatility, NUDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NUDV or NULV?

Over the 3-year period, NULV has performed better with a 16.40% return vs 15.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUDV or NULV?

NUDV and NULV have the same expense ratio: 0.26% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUDV or NULV?

NUDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 1.48% for NULV.

What is the main difference between NUDV and NULV?

NUDV tracks Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index, while NULV tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large Cap Value.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NULV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.