PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NUDV vs. NCLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NUDV vs. NCLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NUDV achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly higher than NCLO's 1.96% return.


NUDV

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.42%
YTD
9.63%
6M
10.03%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
10Y*

NCLO

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.96%
6M
2.57%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUDV vs. NCLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
9.63%10.77%-3.49%
NCLO
Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF
1.96%6.28%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDV and NCLO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NUDV vs. NCLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDV
NUDV Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

NCLO
NCLO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NCLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCLO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NCLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCLO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDV vs. NCLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NUDVNCLODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

1.94

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.08

12.85

-2.77

NUDV vs. NCLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the NCLO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDV and NCLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NUDVNCLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.63

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.59

-0.95

Drawdowns

NUDV vs. NCLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDV drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, which is greater than NCLO's maximum drawdown of -3.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDV and NCLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NUDVNCLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-3.05%

-17.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-3.05%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.35%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-0.20%

-4.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

0.46%

+1.39%

Volatility

NUDV vs. NCLO - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF (NCLO) at 1.14%. This indicates that NUDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NCLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NUDVNCLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

1.14%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

3.46%

+3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

3.64%

+6.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

3.72%

+11.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

3.72%

+11.25%

NUDV vs. NCLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NUDV and NCLO have an expense ratio of 0.26%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NUDV vs. NCLO - Dividend Comparison

NUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than NCLO's 5.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
NCLO
Nuveen AA-BBB CLO ETF
5.78%6.09%0.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUDV
Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF
2.27%2.36%6.18%2.48%2.96%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


NUDV and NCLO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUDV has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to NCLO (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDV dropped -20.10% vs NCLO's -3.05%.

On 1-year performance, NUDV leads with 18.63% vs 5.90% for NCLO. Both ETFs have the same 0.26% expense ratio. On volatility, NCLO has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NUDV has performed better with a 18.63% return vs 5.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NUDV and NCLO have the same expense ratio: 0.26% per year.

NCLO has the higher dividend yield at 5.78%, compared with 2.27% for NUDV.

NUDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NCLO is CLO. NUDV tracks Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index, while NCLO tracks JP Morgan CLO A Index.

NUDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NUDV and NCLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer