NUDV vs. CMDT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NUDV (Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NUDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NUDV returned 15.78%/yr vs 11.87%/yr for CMDT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NUDV charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.

Performance

NUDV vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NUDV having a 10.57% return and CMDT slightly higher at 10.73%.

NUDV

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 6M: 9.45%
• 1Y: 18.55%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMDT

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: -11.03%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 6M: 10.29%
• 1Y: 20.39%
• 3Y*: 11.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NUDV vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NUDV Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF	10.57%	10.77%	14.02%	12.90%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	10.73%	12.78%	6.93%	5.37%

Correlation

The correlation between NUDV and CMDT is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2023	0.05

The correlation between NUDV and CMDT shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NUDV vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NUDV

NUDV Risk / Return Rank: 62
NUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
NUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
NUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
NUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
NUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CMDT

CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 48
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NUDV vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NUDV	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.62	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	2.25	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.28	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	1.55	+1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.03	8.61	+1.43

NUDV vs. CMDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NUDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the CMDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NUDV and CMDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NUDV vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NUDV drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -13.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NUDV and CMDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NUDV	CMDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.10%	-13.23%	-6.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.60%	-13.23%	+6.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.48%	-13.23%	-3.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-13.23%	+12.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.87%	-2.78%	-2.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	2.37%	-0.52%

Volatility

NUDV vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF (NUDV) is 2.99%, while PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that NUDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NUDV	CMDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	3.79%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.65%	10.89%	-3.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.41%	12.78%	-2.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.93%	12.31%	+2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	12.31%	+2.62%

NUDV vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NUDV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

NUDV vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

NUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than CMDT's 2.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.73%	3.04%	8.80%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%
NUDV Nuveen ESG Dividend ETF	2.26%	2.36%	6.18%	2.48%	2.96%	0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NUDV and CMDT in my portfolio?

NUDV and CMDT have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NUDV or CMDT?

CMDT has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to NUDV (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NUDV dropped -20.10% vs CMDT's -13.23%.

Which ETF is better, NUDV or CMDT?

On 3-year performance, NUDV leads with 15.78% vs 11.87% for CMDT. On fees, NUDV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NUDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NUDV or CMDT?

Over the 3-year period, NUDV has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 11.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NUDV or CMDT?

NUDV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NUDV or CMDT?

CMDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 2.26% for NUDV.

What is the main difference between NUDV and CMDT?

NUDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CMDT is Commodities. NUDV tracks Nuveen ESG USA High Dividend Yield Index, while CMDT tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NUDV and 0.65% for CMDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NUDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.