PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSX vs. SPLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSX vs. SPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NTSX

1D
-1.05%
1M
4.37%
YTD
8.62%
6M
7.83%
1Y
25.27%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*

SPLS

1D
-0.65%
1M
5.18%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSX vs. SPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NTSX and SPLS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSX vs. SPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SPLS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSX vs. SPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSXSPLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.25

NTSX vs. SPLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSXSPLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.82

-1.11

Drawdowns

NTSX vs. SPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than SPLS's maximum drawdown of -9.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and SPLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSXSPLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-9.24%

-22.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-0.65%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-1.85%

-4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

Volatility

NTSX vs. SPLS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSXSPLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

15.02%

-2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

15.02%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

15.02%

+3.25%

NTSX vs. SPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLS's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NTSX vs. SPLS - Dividend Comparison

NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than SPLS's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%
SPLS
PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF
0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, NTSX and SPLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SPLS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPLS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.22% for SPLS.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.18% for SPLS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSX and SPLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer