NTSX vs. SPLS
NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) and SPLS (PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NTSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for SPLS.
Performance
NTSX vs. SPLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NTSX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
SPLS
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSX vs. SPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 7.27% |
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF | 9.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSX and SPLS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSX vs. SPLS — Risk / Return Rank
NTSX
SPLS
NTSX vs. SPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF (SPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTSX | SPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTSX | SPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.82 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
NTSX vs. SPLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than SPLS's maximum drawdown of -9.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and SPLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSX | SPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -9.24% | -22.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.65% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -1.85% | -4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | — | — |
Volatility
NTSX vs. SPLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSX | SPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 15.02% | -2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 15.02% | +2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 15.02% | +3.25% |
NTSX vs. SPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLS's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NTSX vs. SPLS - Dividend Comparison
NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than SPLS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.08% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% |
SPLS PIMCO U.S. Stocks PLUS Active Bond ETF | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, NTSX and SPLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPLS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPLS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for NTSX.
NTSX has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.22% for SPLS.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.18% for SPLS.
Find the right allocation for NTSX and SPLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer