NTSX vs. RSBT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) and RSBT (Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while RSBT is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NTSX returned 18.55%/yr vs 3.21%/yr for RSBT. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NTSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for RSBT.

Performance

NTSX vs. RSBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly higher than RSBT's 6.42% return.

NTSX

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: -0.68%
• YTD: 7.28%
• 6M: 7.49%
• 1Y: 23.34%
• 3Y*: 18.55%
• 5Y*: 9.23%
• 10Y*: —

RSBT

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -3.00%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 23.51%
• 3Y*: 3.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSX vs. RSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund	7.28%	18.82%	20.20%	12.76%
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	6.42%	10.31%	-2.90%	-11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSX and RSBT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2023	0.45

The correlation between NTSX and RSBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

NTSX vs. RSBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NTSX	RSBT
Technology	35.1%	-
Communication Services	12.5%	-
Financial Services	12.3%	136.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	-
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	7.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	-
Energy	3.5%	-
Utilities	2.1%	-
Real Estate	1.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

NTSX vs. RSBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSX

NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 59
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

RSBT

RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 56
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSX vs. RSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NTSX	RSBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.52	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	1.97	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.28	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	3.53	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.43	9.11	+1.32

NTSX vs. RSBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the RSBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSX and RSBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NTSX vs. RSBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than RSBT's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and RSBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTSX	RSBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-23.60%	-7.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-6.33%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.82%	-18.98%	+2.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	-3.83%	+1.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.78%	-12.55%	+5.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	2.45%	-0.32%

Volatility

NTSX vs. RSBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is 5.05%, while Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that NTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTSX	RSBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.05%	5.71%	-0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.34%	11.07%	-0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.92%	14.74%	-1.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.13%	13.88%	+3.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.30%	13.88%	+4.42%

NTSX vs. RSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTSX vs. RSBT - Dividend Comparison

NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than RSBT's 3.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund	1.09%	1.14%	1.14%	1.21%	1.36%	0.82%	0.92%	1.42%	0.62%
RSBT Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF	3.01%	3.20%	0.00%	2.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTSX and RSBT in my portfolio?

NTSX and RSBT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NTSX or RSBT?

RSBT has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to NTSX (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs RSBT's -23.60%.

Which ETF is better, NTSX or RSBT?

On 3-year performance, NTSX leads with 18.55% vs 3.21% for RSBT. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NTSX or RSBT?

Over the 3-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 18.55% return vs 3.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NTSX or RSBT?

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RSBT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NTSX or RSBT?

RSBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.09% for NTSX.

What is the main difference between NTSX and RSBT?

NTSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while RSBT is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.97% for RSBT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.