NTSX vs. INCM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) and INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NTSX returned 18.24%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for INCM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for INCM.

Performance

NTSX vs. INCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NTSX having a 6.46% return and INCM slightly lower at 6.27%.

NTSX

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 6.46%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: 21.24%
• 3Y*: 18.24%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: —

INCM

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: 6.27%
• 6M: 6.27%
• 1Y: 13.86%
• 3Y*: 10.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSX vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund	6.46%	18.82%	20.20%	10.65%
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF	6.27%	13.07%	6.80%	5.76%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSX and INCM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2023	0.68

The correlation between NTSX and INCM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NTSX vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSX

NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 50
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

INCM

INCM Risk / Return Rank: 85
INCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
INCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
INCM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
INCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
INCM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSX vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NTSX	INCM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.52	-0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	3.60	-1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.47	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	4.36	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.93	18.05	-8.13

NTSX vs. INCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the INCM Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSX and INCM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NTSX vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, which is greater than INCM's maximum drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and INCM.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTSX	INCM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.34%	-7.84%	-23.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-3.19%	-5.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.82%	-7.84%	-8.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-0.92%	-2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-1.08%	-5.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	0.77%	+1.37%

Volatility

NTSX vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) at 2.44%. This indicates that NTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTSX	INCM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	2.44%	+2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.56%	4.29%	+6.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.13%	5.58%	+7.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.17%	7.28%	+9.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.29%	7.28%	+11.01%

NTSX vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTSX vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison

NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than INCM's 5.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF	5.09%	4.96%	5.06%	3.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund	1.10%	1.14%	1.14%	1.21%	1.36%	0.82%	0.92%	1.42%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTSX and INCM in my portfolio?

NTSX and INCM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NTSX or INCM?

NTSX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to INCM (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs INCM's -7.84%.

Which ETF is better, NTSX or INCM?

On 3-year performance, NTSX leads with 18.24% vs 10.76% for INCM. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, INCM has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NTSX or INCM?

Over the 3-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 18.24% return vs 10.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NTSX or INCM?

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for INCM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NTSX or INCM?

INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 1.10% for NTSX.

What is the main difference between NTSX and INCM?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.38% for INCM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.