NTSX vs. DXJ
NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. NTSX is actively managed, while DXJ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSX returned 9.69%/yr vs 26.13%/yr for DXJ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for DXJ.
Performance
NTSX vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 19.64% return.
NTSX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
DXJ
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 7.24%
- YTD
- 19.64%
- 6M
- 24.36%
- 1Y
- 53.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.15%
- 5Y*
- 26.13%
- 10Y*
- 18.33%
NTSX vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 8.62% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 22.21% | 24.87% | 32.03% | -8.72% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 19.64% | 32.78% | 29.83% | 42.04% | 5.96% | 17.99% | 3.94% | 18.94% | -16.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSX and DXJ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018 | 0.54 |
The correlation between NTSX and DXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NTSX vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NTSX
DXJ
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
NTSX
DXJ
Communication Services
NTSX
DXJ
Financial Services
NTSX
DXJ
Consumer Cyclical
NTSX
DXJ
Healthcare
NTSX
DXJ
Industrials
NTSX
DXJ
Consumer Defensive
NTSX
DXJ
Energy
NTSX
DXJ
Utilities
NTSX
DXJ
Real Estate
NTSX
DXJ
-
Basic Materials
NTSX
DXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSX vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank
NTSX
DXJ
NTSX vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTSX | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.56 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 4.94 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 19.29 | -7.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTSX | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 3.11 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 1.39 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.43 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
NTSX vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and DXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSX | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -49.63% | +18.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -10.98% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -22.19% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | -22.19% | -9.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | 0.00% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -14.34% | +7.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.81% | -0.74% |
Volatility
NTSX vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) have volatilities of 3.39% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSX | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 3.55% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 13.09% | -3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 17.44% | -5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 18.96% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 20.18% | -1.91% |
NTSX vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSX vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison
NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, which matches DXJ's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 1.08% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.08% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSX and DXJ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXJ has higher volatility (3.55%) compared to NTSX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs DXJ's -49.63%.
On 5-year performance, DXJ leads with 26.13% vs 9.69% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 26.13% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.
NTSX and DXJ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.08%.
NTSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DXJ is Japan Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSX and DXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer