NTSX vs. DLN
NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) and DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while DLN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. NTSX is actively managed, while DLN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSX returned 9.69%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for DLN. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NTSX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
NTSX vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly lower than DLN's 9.93% return.
NTSX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
DLN
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
NTSX vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 8.62% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 22.21% | 24.87% | 32.03% | -8.72% |
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 9.93% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 4.59% | 28.91% | -8.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSX and DLN is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between NTSX and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
NTSX vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NTSX
DLN
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
NTSX
DLN
Communication Services
NTSX
DLN
Financial Services
NTSX
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
NTSX
DLN
Healthcare
NTSX
DLN
Industrials
NTSX
DLN
Consumer Defensive
NTSX
DLN
Energy
NTSX
DLN
Utilities
NTSX
DLN
Real Estate
NTSX
DLN
Basic Materials
NTSX
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSX vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
NTSX
DLN
NTSX vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTSX | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 2.53 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.81 | 3.64 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.46 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 3.69 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 15.59 | -3.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTSX | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 2.53 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.93 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.53 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
NTSX vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSX | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -57.84% | +26.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -6.10% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -13.71% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.34% | -16.26% | -15.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -0.51% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -7.52% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.44% | +0.63% |
Volatility
NTSX vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that NTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSX | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 2.17% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 6.77% | +2.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 8.87% | +3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 13.26% | +3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 16.16% | +2.11% |
NTSX vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSX vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.08% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSX and DLN have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 5-year performance, DLN leads with 12.22% vs 9.69% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DLN.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.
NTSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DLN is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.28% for DLN.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSX and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer