PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSX vs. DLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSX vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSX achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than DLN's 13.81% return.


NTSX

1D
1.59%
1M
1.07%
6M
7.46%
YTD
8.99%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
18.54%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.84%

DLN

1D
0.69%
1M
2.28%
6M
9.47%
YTD
13.81%
1Y
22.57%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
12.58%
ALL TIME*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.06M$9.95M$12.21M
$1.98M$1.82M$2.61M

NTSX vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
8.99%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-7.87%
DLN
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund
13.81%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%4.59%28.91%-7.92%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSX and DLN is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018

0.81

The correlation between NTSX and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSX vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NTSX vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) and WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTSXDLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.46

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.72

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

15.65

-7.03

NTSX vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSX and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTSX vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSX and DLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSXDLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.34%

-57.84%

+26.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-6.10%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-13.71%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.34%

-16.26%

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

0.00%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-7.47%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

1.45%

+0.81%

Volatility

NTSX vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund (DLN) at 2.34%. This indicates that NTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSXDLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

2.34%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

6.92%

+3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.35%

8.99%

+4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

13.24%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

16.12%

+2.11%

NTSX vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTSX vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

NTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than DLN's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLN
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend Fund
1.74%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.08%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSX and DLN have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to DLN (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSX dropped -31.34% vs DLN's -57.84%.

On 5-year performance, DLN leads with 12.59% vs 8.42% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DLN.

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

NTSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DLN is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for NTSX and 0.28% for DLN.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSX and DLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer