NTSG.DE vs. SLVR.DE
NTSG.DE (WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and SLVR.DE (WisdomTree Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSG.DE is a Global Allocation fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Efficient Core Index, while SLVR.DE is a Silver fund tracking the Bloomberg Silver Subindex. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NTSG.DE returned 20.71% vs 93.81% for SLVR.DE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NTSG.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SLVR.DE.
Performance
NTSG.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSG.DE achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly higher than SLVR.DE's 1.99% return.
NTSG.DE
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 20.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLVR.DE
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 17.62%
- 1Y
- 93.81%
- 3Y*
- 45.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSG.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NTSG.DE WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 8.92% | 8.14% | 0.20% |
SLVR.DE WisdomTree Silver | 1.99% | 147.57% | -5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSG.DE and SLVR.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSG.DE vs. SLVR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NTSG.DE
SLVR.DE
NTSG.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) and WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTSG.DE | SLVR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 3.06 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.64 | 7.37 | +4.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTSG.DE | SLVR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.85 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.68 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
NTSG.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum SLVR.DE drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSG.DE and SLVR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSG.DE | SLVR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.64% | -31.33% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.26% | -30.51% | +24.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -24.02% | +23.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -12.66% | +8.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 12.69% | -10.92% |
Volatility
NTSG.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) is 3.24%, while WisdomTree Silver (SLVR.DE) has a volatility of 17.06%. This indicates that NTSG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSG.DE | SLVR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 17.06% | -13.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.09% | 41.25% | -33.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.12% | 50.34% | -39.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 38.29% | -23.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 38.29% | -23.99% |
NTSG.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSG.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVR.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSG.DE vs. SLVR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither NTSG.DE nor SLVR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSG.DE and SLVR.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSG.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSG.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SLVR.DE.
NTSG.DE is categorized as Global Allocation, while SLVR.DE is Silver. NTSG.DE tracks WisdomTree Global Efficient Core Index, while SLVR.DE tracks Bloomberg Silver Subindex. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NTSG.DE and 0.49% for SLVR.DE.
Find the right allocation for NTSG.DE and SLVR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer