NTSG.DE vs. MACV.DE
NTSG.DE (WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and MACV.DE (iShares Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Global Allocation funds. NTSG.DE is passively managed, while MACV.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, NTSG.DE returned 24.04% vs 6.52% for MACV.DE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
NTSG.DE vs. MACV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSG.DE achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly higher than MACV.DE's 3.45% return.
NTSG.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MACV.DE
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 6.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.60%
- 10Y*
- —
NTSG.DE vs. MACV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NTSG.DE WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 12.69% | 8.14% | 0.64% |
MACV.DE iShares Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 3.45% | 4.83% | -0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSG.DE and MACV.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between NTSG.DE and MACV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSG.DE vs. MACV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NTSG.DE
MACV.DE
NTSG.DE vs. MACV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) and iShares Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MACV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTSG.DE | MACV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.24 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 1.64 | +2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.58 | 7.16 | +6.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTSG.DE vs. MACV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, which is greater than MACV.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSG.DE and MACV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSG.DE | MACV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.64% | -15.57% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.26% | -3.95% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.55% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | -6.29% | +2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 0.91% | +0.87% |
Volatility
NTSG.DE vs. MACV.DE - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.07% compared to iShares Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MACV.DE) at 1.34%. This indicates that NTSG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MACV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSG.DE | MACV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.07% | 1.34% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 4.63% | +3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.36% | 5.30% | +6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 5.26% | +8.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 5.23% | +8.86% |
NTSG.DE vs. MACV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NTSG.DE and MACV.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NTSG.DE vs. MACV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither NTSG.DE nor MACV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSG.DE and MACV.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSG.DE and MACV.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares.
Find the right allocation for NTSG.DE and MACV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer