PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSG.DE vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSG.DE vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

NTSG.DE is traded in EUR, while ACWI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSG.DE achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 13.75% return.


NTSG.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
5.20%
YTD
8.92%
6M
7.87%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACWI

1D
0.16%
1M
5.15%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.38%
1Y
27.07%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
12.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSG.DE vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NTSG.DE
WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
8.92%8.14%0.20%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
13.75%7.89%0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSG.DE and ACWI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024

0.52

The correlation between NTSG.DE and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSG.DE vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSG.DE
NTSG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NTSG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSG.DE vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSG.DEACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.41

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.82

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.64

15.98

-4.33

NTSG.DE vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSG.DE and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSG.DEACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.21

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.55

+0.24

Drawdowns

NTSG.DE vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSG.DE and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSG.DEACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-45.79%

+26.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.26%

-7.11%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.39%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-6.43%

+2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

1.70%

+0.07%

Volatility

NTSG.DE vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.03%. This indicates that NTSG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSG.DEACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

3.03%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

9.28%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

12.29%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.30%

15.11%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.30%

16.96%

-2.66%

NTSG.DE vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSG.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTSG.DE vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

NTSG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
NTSG.DE
WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSG.DE and ACWI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSG.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSG.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

NTSG.DE is categorized as Global Allocation, while ACWI is Global Equities. NTSG.DE tracks WisdomTree Global Efficient Core Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NTSG.DE and 0.32% for ACWI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSG.DE and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer