NTSG.DE vs. DEGC.DE
NTSG.DE (WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and DEGC.DE (Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSG.DE is a Global Allocation fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Efficient Core Index, while DEGC.DE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. NTSG.DE is passively managed, while DEGC.DE is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSG.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for DEGC.DE.
Performance
NTSG.DE vs. DEGC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSG.DE achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than DEGC.DE's 11.44% return.
NTSG.DE
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 7.87%
- 1Y
- 20.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEGC.DE
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 6M
- 11.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSG.DE vs. DEGC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NTSG.DE WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 8.92% | 0.73% |
DEGC.DE Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.44% | 2.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSG.DE and DEGC.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSG.DE vs. DEGC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NTSG.DE
DEGC.DE
NTSG.DE vs. DEGC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Efficient Core UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (NTSG.DE) and Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DEGC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTSG.DE | DEGC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.64 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTSG.DE | DEGC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 2.82 | -2.03 |
Drawdowns
NTSG.DE vs. DEGC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSG.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, which is greater than DEGC.DE's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSG.DE and DEGC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSG.DE | DEGC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.64% | -5.49% | -14.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -1.06% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | — | — |
Volatility
NTSG.DE vs. DEGC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSG.DE | DEGC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.12% | 9.55% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 9.55% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 9.55% | +4.75% |
NTSG.DE vs. DEGC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSG.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DEGC.DE's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NTSG.DE vs. DEGC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither NTSG.DE nor DEGC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSG.DE and DEGC.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSG.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSG.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DEGC.DE.
NTSG.DE is categorized as Global Allocation, while DEGC.DE is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NTSG.DE and 0.26% for DEGC.DE.
Find the right allocation for NTSG.DE and DEGC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer