PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSE vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSE vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSE achieves a 32.02% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.


NTSE

1D
-1.17%
1M
11.32%
YTD
32.02%
6M
34.98%
1Y
64.08%
3Y*
25.03%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSE vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
32.02%36.29%4.42%9.47%-26.31%-5.66%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSE and YCS is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

-0.24

The correlation between NTSE and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (1 year) to -0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSE vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSE
NTSE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NTSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSE vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSEYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.35

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

3.97

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.57

12.40

+5.17

NTSE vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSE Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSE and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSEYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.11

1.92

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

1.12

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.33

+0.05

Drawdowns

NTSE vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSE drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSE and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSEYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.84%

-49.56%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-8.30%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-23.05%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.84%

-27.32%

-15.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

0.00%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.74%

-19.93%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

2.66%

+1.00%

Volatility

NTSE vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that NTSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSEYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

2.75%

+6.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.18%

12.32%

+5.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.73%

17.27%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

21.10%

-1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

19.01%

+0.22%

NTSE vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTSE vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
2.51%3.35%3.23%2.44%3.22%2.10%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSE and YCS have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSE has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSE dropped -42.84% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.54% vs 6.43% for NTSE. On fees, NTSE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.54% return vs 6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

NTSE has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

NTSE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for NTSE and 1.00% for YCS.

NTSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSE and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer