PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSE vs. WTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSE vs. WTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSE achieves a 30.29% return, which is significantly higher than WTV's 11.47% return.


NTSE

1D
-1.31%
1M
7.69%
YTD
30.29%
6M
33.64%
1Y
59.40%
3Y*
24.55%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*

WTV

1D
0.86%
1M
4.50%
YTD
11.47%
6M
12.37%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSE vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
30.29%36.29%4.42%9.47%-26.31%-5.66%
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
11.47%13.51%23.99%22.35%-8.06%8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSE and WTV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.53

The correlation between NTSE and WTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

NTSE vs. WTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NTSE
WTV

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
10.7%

Financial Services

2.1%
19.5%

Communication Services

1.8%
6.9%

Technology

0.8%
15.3%

Basic Materials

0.5%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
10.7%

Industrials

0.2%
10.5%

Healthcare

0.2%
7.3%

Energy

0.1%
6.8%

Real Estate

0.1%
5.3%

Utilities

0.0%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

NTSE
2.2%
WTV
10.7%

Financial Services

NTSE
2.1%
WTV
19.5%

Communication Services

NTSE
1.8%
WTV
6.9%

Technology

NTSE
0.8%
WTV
15.3%

Basic Materials

NTSE
0.5%
WTV
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

NTSE
0.3%
WTV
10.7%

Industrials

NTSE
0.2%
WTV
10.5%

Healthcare

NTSE
0.2%
WTV
7.3%

Energy

NTSE
0.1%
WTV
6.8%

Real Estate

NTSE
0.1%
WTV
5.3%

Utilities

NTSE
0.0%
WTV
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSE vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSE
NTSE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NTSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

WTV
WTV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSE vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSEWTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.38

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

3.54

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.27

11.55

+4.72

NTSE vs. WTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSE Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the WTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSE and WTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSEWTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

2.15

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.79

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.68

-0.31

Drawdowns

NTSE vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSE drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, roughly equal to the maximum WTV drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSE and WTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSEWTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.84%

-42.18%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-7.15%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-18.49%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.84%

-19.30%

-23.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-0.11%

-2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-5.05%

-14.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

2.19%

+1.47%

Volatility

NTSE vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a higher volatility of 9.12% compared to WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) at 3.01%. This indicates that NTSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSEWTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.12%

3.01%

+6.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.25%

7.92%

+10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

11.82%

+8.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

17.09%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.24%

20.20%

-0.96%

NTSE vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

NTSE vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison

NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than WTV's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NTSE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund
2.54%3.35%3.23%2.44%3.22%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
1.64%1.59%1.54%1.62%2.08%1.55%1.63%1.44%1.94%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSE and WTV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSE has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to WTV (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSE dropped -42.84% vs WTV's -42.18%.

On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.36% vs 6.15% for NTSE. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for NTSE.

NTSE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.64% for WTV.

NTSE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while WTV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for NTSE and 0.12% for WTV.

NTSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSE and WTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer