NTSE vs. RAAX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NTSE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund) and RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSE returned 5.20%/yr vs 13.19%/yr for RAAX. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RAAX.

Performance

NTSE vs. RAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSE achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly higher than RAAX's 12.31% return.

NTSE

• 1D: -2.05%
• 1M: -6.67%
• 6M: 13.48%
• YTD: 20.86%
• 1Y: 39.75%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 5.20%
• 10Y*: —

RAAX

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -3.04%
• 6M: 5.51%
• YTD: 12.31%
• 1Y: 26.07%
• 3Y*: 18.14%
• 5Y*: 13.19%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSE vs. RAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund	20.86%	36.29%	4.42%	9.47%	-26.31%	-5.67%
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	12.31%	26.74%	12.50%	6.71%	1.51%	6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSE and RAAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021	0.50

The correlation between NTSE and RAAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NTSE vs. RAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSE

NTSE Risk / Return Rank: 64
NTSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
NTSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
NTSE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NTSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
NTSE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

RAAX

RAAX Risk / Return Rank: 68
RAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSE vs. RAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) and VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NTSE	RAAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.78	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.39	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.32	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	2.97	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.50	9.09	+0.42

NTSE vs. RAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the RAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSE and RAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NTSE vs. RAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSE drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, which is greater than RAAX's maximum drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSE and RAAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NTSE	RAAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.84%	-33.91%	-8.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.20%	-8.81%	-5.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.73%	-11.59%	-7.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.15%	-23.55%	-17.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.63%	-8.13%	-1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.40%	-6.77%	-12.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	2.88%	+1.31%

Volatility

NTSE vs. RAAX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) at 4.62%. This indicates that NTSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NTSE	RAAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.13%	4.62%	+5.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.38%	12.50%	+9.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.41%	14.70%	+9.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.13%	15.72%	+4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.93%	15.79%	+4.14%

NTSE vs. RAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than RAAX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

NTSE vs. RAAX - Dividend Comparison

NTSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than RAAX's 2.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NTSE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund	2.72%	3.35%	3.23%	2.44%	3.22%	2.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	2.08%	2.34%	1.91%	3.66%	1.53%	8.72%	6.27%	2.37%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NTSE and RAAX in my portfolio?

NTSE and RAAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NTSE or RAAX?

NTSE has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to RAAX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSE dropped -42.84% vs RAAX's -33.91%.

Which ETF is better, NTSE or RAAX?

On 5-year performance, RAAX leads with 13.19% vs 5.20% for NTSE. On fees, NTSE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, RAAX has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NTSE or RAAX?

Over the 5-year period, RAAX has performed better with a 13.19% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NTSE or RAAX?

NTSE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RAAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NTSE or RAAX?

NTSE has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.08% for RAAX.

What is the main difference between NTSE and RAAX?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for NTSE and 0.89% for RAAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.